139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15712046)
1. [Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging].
Liener K; Wunderlich A; Ehret G; Bachor E
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15712046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detection of central auditory compensation in unilateral deafness with functional magnetic resonance tomography].
Tschopp K; Schillinger C; Schmid N; Rausch M; Bilecen D; Scheffler K
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Dec; 79(12):753-7. PubMed ID: 11199459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
Nordell A; Lundh M; Horsch S; Hallberg B; Aden U; Nordell B; Blennow M
Acta Paediatr; 2009 Aug; 98(8):1278-83. PubMed ID: 19432831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.
Zera J; Mlynski R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2082-96. PubMed ID: 17902846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of the kurtosis statistic in evaluating complex noise exposures for the protection of hearing.
Davis RI; Qiu W; Hamernik RP
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 19657275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
Lusk SL
AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner.
Hattori Y; Fukatsu H; Ishigaki T
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2007 Jan; 69(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 17378177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Change of the peak level and frequency of impulse sound between free field and meatal cavity in its significance for acoustic trauma (author's transl)].
Pfander F
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Oct; 60(10):517-9. PubMed ID: 7345278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory cortex stimulation by low-frequency tones-an fMRI study.
Dommes E; Bauknecht HC; Scholz G; Rothemund Y; Hensel J; Klingebiel R
Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1304():129-37. PubMed ID: 19796632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military.
Pelausa EO; Abel SM; Simard J; Dempsey I
J Otolaryngol; 1995 Oct; 24(5):271-80. PubMed ID: 8537985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neuroanatomic differences in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss detected using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Propst EJ; Greinwald JH; Schmithorst V
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 136(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20083773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
