156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15712175)
21. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Current practice in handling and reporting prostate needle biopsies: results of a Turkish survey.
Muezzinoglu B; Yorukoglu K
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 May; 211(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 25701362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations.
Zhou M; Li J; Cheng L; Egevad L; Deng FM; Kunju LP; Magi-Galluzzi C; Melamed J; Mehra R; Mendrinos S; Osunkoya AO; Paner G; Shen SS; Tsuzuki T; Trpkov K; Tian W; Yang X; Shah RB
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1331-9. PubMed ID: 26099009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Discrepancy between Gleason score of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens--current situation of general pathologists].
Kato T; Nakano M; Uno H; Seike K; Kojima K; Kubota Y; Goto T; Yamamoto N; Ehara H; Kanimoto Y; Takahashi Y; Deguchi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Oct; 54(10):641-5. PubMed ID: 19048927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reporting Practices and Resource Utilization in the Era of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Survey of Genitourinary Subspecialists.
Gandhi JS; Smith SC; Paner GP; McKenney JK; Sekhri R; Osunkoya AO; Baras AS; DeMarzo AM; Cheville JC; Jimenez RE; Trpkov K; Colecchia M; Ro JY; Montironi R; Menon S; Hes O; Williamson SR; Hirsch MS; Netto GJ; Fine SW; Sirohi D; Kaushal S; Sangoi A; Robinson BD; Kweldam CF; Humphrey PA; Hansel DE; Schultz L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Przybycin CG; Shah RB; Mehra R; Kunju LP; Aron M; Kryvenko ON; Kench JG; Kuroda N; Tavora F; van der Kwast T; Grignon DJ; Epstein JI; Reuter VE; Amin MB
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 May; 44(5):673-680. PubMed ID: 31876580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason pattern 5 on core biopsy: frequency of diagnosis, morphologic subpatterns, and relation to pattern distribution based on the modified Gleason grading system.
Shah RB; Tadros Y
Hum Pathol; 2014 Nov; 45(11):2263-9. PubMed ID: 25228336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice.
Moreira Leite KR; Camara-Lopes LH; Dall'Oglio MF; Cury J; Antunes AA; Sañudo A; Srougi M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):353-6. PubMed ID: 18774658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pathology residents' use of a Web-based tutorial to improve Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma on needle biopsies.
Kronz JD; Silberman MA; Allsbrook WC; Bastacky SI; Burks RT; Cina SJ; Mills SE; Ross JS; Sakr WA; Tomaszewski JE; True LD; Ulbright TM; Weinstein MW; Yantiss RK; Young RH; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2000 Sep; 31(9):1044-50. PubMed ID: 11014569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
Kweldam CF; Nieboer D; Algaba F; Amin MB; Berney DM; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Bubendorf L; Cheng L; Compérat E; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Evans AJ; Hansel DE; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Tan PH; Varma M; Zhou M; van Leenders GJ
Histopathology; 2016 Sep; 69(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 27028587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trends in distribution and prognostic significance of Gleason grades on radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens between 1989 and 2001.
Sengupta S; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC; Sebo TJ; Myers RP; Cheville JC; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(12):2630-5. PubMed ID: 16703592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative study between prostatic carcinoma G1-G3 and Gleason grading systems.
Zaharia B; Pleşea IE; Enache SD; Tomescu P; Panuş A; Pop OT; Badea P; Kozokić A
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 1999-2004; 45():185-97. PubMed ID: 15847394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Identification of Gleason pattern 5 on prostatic needle core biopsy: frequency of underdiagnosis and relation to morphology.
Fajardo DA; Miyamoto H; Miller JS; Lee TK; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Nov; 35(11):1706-11. PubMed ID: 21997691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Practice patterns related to prostate cancer grading: results of a 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society clinician survey.
Fine SW; Trpkov K; Amin MB; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; Costello T; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong MX; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Pavlovich CP; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Epstein JI
Urol Oncol; 2021 May; 39(5):295.e1-295.e8. PubMed ID: 32948433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
