388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15712421)
1. The CCAR responsum on end of life issues: an American legal perspective.
Saperstein D; Mishkin D
CCAR J; 1997; 44(2):36-45. PubMed ID: 15712421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsible public policy at the end of life.
Chopko ME
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1998; 75(3):557-94. PubMed ID: 12627572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to assisted suicide in Washington and Oregon: the courts won't allow a northwest passage.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1996; 5(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 16086524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there a right to physician-assisted suicide?
Bleich JD
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):795-815. PubMed ID: 12455512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The promised end--physician-assisted suicide and abortion.
Annas GJ
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):183-99. PubMed ID: 12385307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The court upholds a state law prohibiting physician-assisted suicide.
Feinberg B
J Crim Law Criminol; 1998; 88(3):847-76. PubMed ID: 12455522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Suicide: a constitutional right?"-- reflections eleven years later.
Marzen TJ; O'Dowd MK; Crone D; Balch TJ
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):261-84. PubMed ID: 12385309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician-assisted suicide: new protocol for a rightful death.
O'Brien CN; Madek GA
Neb Law Rev; 1998; 77(2):229-80. PubMed ID: 12769108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
Goebel BC
William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to die with dignity with the assistance of a physician: an Anglo, American and Australian international perspective.
Woods E
ILSA J Int Law; 1998; 4(2):817-34. PubMed ID: 12236256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the Constitution a suicide pact?
Avila D
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):201-59. PubMed ID: 12385308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The last best place to die: physician-assisted suicide and Montana's constitutional right to personal autonomy privacy.
Fisk SA
Mont Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-41. PubMed ID: 14631926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician-assisted suicide: a common law roadmap for state courts.
Meisel A
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):817-57. PubMed ID: 12455513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the right to die dead?
Samar VJ
De Paul Law Rev; 2000; 50(1):221-64. PubMed ID: 12455502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The "right to die": on drawing (and erasing) lines.
Kamisar Y
Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 35(1):481-521. PubMed ID: 12385319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
Roach CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Gorsuch NM
Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):599-710. PubMed ID: 12524693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
