These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15713169)
1. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Elwyn G; Hutchings H; Edwards A; Rapport F; Wensing M; Cheung WY; Grol R Health Expect; 2005 Mar; 8(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 15713169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy. Goss C; Fontanesi S; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M; Elwyn G; Zimmermann C Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jun; 66(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 17433603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring triadic decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: Observer OPTION Pel-Littel RE; Buurman BM; van de Pol MH; Yilmaz NG; Tulner LR; Minkman MM; Scholte Op Reimer WJM; Elwyn G; van Weert JCM Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Nov; 102(11):1969-1976. PubMed ID: 31279614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the German version of the OPTION scale. Hirsch O; Keller H; Müller-Engelmann M; Gutenbrunner MH; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N Health Expect; 2012 Dec; 15(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 21521432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trying to optimise the German version of the OPTION scale regarding the dyadic aspect of shared decision making. Keller H; Hirsch O; Müller-Engelmann M; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Krones T; Donner-Banzhoff N Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 23907324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The assessment of patient involvement across consultation. The Italian version of the OPTION scale]. Goss C; Fontanesi S; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2007; 16(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 18333430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric properties of the German version of Observer OPTION Kölker M; Topp J; Elwyn G; Härter M; Scholl I BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):74. PubMed ID: 29386031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument. Siriwardena AN; Edwards AG; Campion P; Freeman A; Elwyn G Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):857-62. PubMed ID: 17132353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychometric properties of Observer OPTION(5), an observer measure of shared decision making. Barr PJ; O'Malley AJ; Tsulukidze M; Gionfriddo MR; Montori V; Elwyn G Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Aug; 98(8):970-6. PubMed ID: 25956069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Elwyn G; Edwards A; Hood K; Robling M; Atwell C; Russell I; Wensing M; Grol R; Fam Pract; 2004 Aug; 21(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 15249520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. OPTION(5) versus OPTION(12) instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making. Stubenrouch FE; Pieterse AH; Falkenberg R; Santema TK; Stiggelbout AM; van der Weijden T; Aarts JA; Ubbink DT Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Jun; 99(6):1062-8. PubMed ID: 26776490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The OPTION scale for the assessment of shared decision making (SDM): methodological issues. Nicolai J; Moshagen M; Eich W; Bieber C Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(4):264-71. PubMed ID: 22749073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the observer OPTION Chen Z; Bai X; Jin G; Tao X; Huang G; Zhao Y BMC Fam Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(1):263. PubMed ID: 33280609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Couët N; Desroches S; Robitaille H; Vaillancourt H; Leblanc A; Turcotte S; Elwyn G; Légaré F Health Expect; 2015 Aug; 18(4):542-61. PubMed ID: 23451939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient, clinician and independent observer perspectives of shared decision making in adult orthodontics. Keshtgar A; Cunningham SJ; Jones E; Ryan FS J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 48(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 33888000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments. Weiss MC; Peters TJ Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17942270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the ability of OPTION(12) and OPTION(5) to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling. Vortel MA; Adam S; Port-Thompson AV; Friedman JM; Grande SW; Birch PH Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Oct; 99(10):1717-23. PubMed ID: 27085518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations. Goss C; Moretti F; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M; Zimmermann C Br J Psychiatry; 2008 Nov; 193(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 18978325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The assessment of depressive patients' involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations. Loh A; Simon D; Hennig K; Hennig B; Härter M; Elwyn G Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 16872794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]