153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15713295)
1. Constraining spine stability levels in an optimization model leads to the prediction of trunk muscle cocontraction and improved spine compression force estimates.
Brown SH; Potvin JR
J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 15713295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trunk muscle activation patterns, lumbar compressive forces, and spine stability when using the bodyblade.
Moreside JM; Vera-Garcia FJ; McGill SM
Phys Ther; 2007 Feb; 87(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 17244696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces.
van Dieën JH; Kingma I
Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 15804849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic iso-resistive trunk extension simulation: contributions of the intrinsic and reflexive mechanisms to spinal stability.
Davarani SZ; Shirazi-Adl A; Hemami H; Mousavi SJ; Parnianpour M
Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(6):415-31. PubMed ID: 18057565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Co-activation alters the linear versus non-linear impression of the EMG-torque relationship of trunk muscles.
Brown SH; McGill SM
J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 18054943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography.
Hughes RE; Chaffin DB; Lavender SA; Andersson GB
J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):689-98. PubMed ID: 7931786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions?
Cholewicki J; Ivancic PC; Radebold A
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Jun; 87(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 12070622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transient analysis of trunk response in sudden release loading using kinematics-driven finite element model.
Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19285367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
Mirka GA; Marras WS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks.
Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 16288897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trunk response analysis under sudden forward perturbations using a kinematics-driven model.
Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 19375707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of trunk muscle fatigue and load timing on spinal responses during sudden hand loading.
Grondin DE; Potvin JR
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e237-45. PubMed ID: 18617419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.
Vera-Garcia FJ; Brown SH; Gray JR; McGill SM
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 16442677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of trunk muscles in generating follower load in the lumbar spine of neutral standing posture.
Kim K; Kim YH
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041005. PubMed ID: 18601447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A polynomial equation to predict low back compression force: accounting for the effects of load height on instability.
Calder IC; Potvin JR
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():388-93. PubMed ID: 22316755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
