These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15713295)

  • 1. Constraining spine stability levels in an optimization model leads to the prediction of trunk muscle cocontraction and improved spine compression force estimates.
    Brown SH; Potvin JR
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 15713295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trunk muscle activation patterns, lumbar compressive forces, and spine stability when using the bodyblade.
    Moreside JM; Vera-Garcia FJ; McGill SM
    Phys Ther; 2007 Feb; 87(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 17244696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces.
    van Dieën JH; Kingma I
    Ergonomics; 2005 Mar; 48(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 15804849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic iso-resistive trunk extension simulation: contributions of the intrinsic and reflexive mechanisms to spinal stability.
    Davarani SZ; Shirazi-Adl A; Hemami H; Mousavi SJ; Parnianpour M
    Technol Health Care; 2007; 15(6):415-31. PubMed ID: 18057565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-activation alters the linear versus non-linear impression of the EMG-torque relationship of trunk muscles.
    Brown SH; McGill SM
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 18054943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography.
    Hughes RE; Chaffin DB; Lavender SA; Andersson GB
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):689-98. PubMed ID: 7931786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions?
    Cholewicki J; Ivancic PC; Radebold A
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Jun; 87(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 12070622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient analysis of trunk response in sudden release loading using kinematics-driven finite element model.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 May; 24(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19285367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 16288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trunk response analysis under sudden forward perturbations using a kinematics-driven model.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 19375707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of trunk muscle fatigue and load timing on spinal responses during sudden hand loading.
    Grondin DE; Potvin JR
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e237-45. PubMed ID: 18617419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.
    Vera-Garcia FJ; Brown SH; Gray JR; McGill SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 16442677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of trunk muscles in generating follower load in the lumbar spine of neutral standing posture.
    Kim K; Kim YH
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041005. PubMed ID: 18601447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A polynomial equation to predict low back compression force: accounting for the effects of load height on instability.
    Calder IC; Potvin JR
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():388-93. PubMed ID: 22316755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.