128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15713302)
1. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stiffness and compactness of morselized grafts during impaction: an in vitro study with human femoral heads.
Bavadekar A; Cornu O; Godts B; Delloye C; Van Tomme J; Banse X
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Oct; 72(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 11728073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of fused versus nonfused THA femoral impaction grafts.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Orthop Res; 2007 Mar; 25(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17143908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability differentials for proximal vs distal fusion of total hip arthroplasty femoral impaction grafts.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):921-6. PubMed ID: 18534514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A physical model for simulating fusion of impaction-grafted morselized cancellous bone.
Heiner AD; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2001 Jun; 34(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 11470120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Particle size influence in an impaction bone grafting model. Comparison of fresh-frozen and freeze-dried allografts.
Cornu O; Schubert T; Libouton X; Manil O; Godts B; Van Tomme J; Banse X; Delloye C
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2238-42. PubMed ID: 19656513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Larger bone graft size and washing of bone grafts prior to impaction enhances the initial stability of cemented cups: experiments using a synthetic acetabular model.
Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Schreurs BW
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 16752283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur.
Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi SP; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 17540758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical properties of 7-10mm bone grafts and small slurry grafts in impaction bone grafting.
Xu ZJ; Chen LY; Zhong C; Tan YB; He RX
J Orthop Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1491-5. PubMed ID: 21469177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impaction bone grafting: a laboratory comparison of two methods.
Putzer D; Mayr E; Haid C; Reinthaler A; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1049-53. PubMed ID: 21768627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaction grafting with a bone-graft substitute in a sheep model of revision hip replacement.
Coathup M; Smith N; Kingsley C; Buckland T; Dattani R; Ascroft GP; Blunn G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Feb; 90(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18256099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impaction bone grafting with freeze-dried irradiated bone. Part II. Changes in stiffness and compactness of morselized grafts: experiments in cadavers.
Cornu O; Bavadekar A; Godts B; Van Tomme J; Delloye C; Banse X
Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Oct; 74(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 14620975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of the addition of hydroxyapatite graft substitutes upon the hoop strain and subsequent subsidence of a femoral model during impaction bone grafting.
McNamara IR; Rayment A; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 22100099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic, biodegradable impaction graft substitute.
Lutton C; Wheatley D; Wilson L; Van der Velden W; Crawford R; Goss B
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Nov; 95(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 20632400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neck fracture femoral heads for impaction bone grafting: evolution of stiffness and compactness during impaction of osteoarthrotic and neck-fracture femoral heads.
Cornu O; Manil O; Godts B; Naets B; Van Tomme J; Delloye C; Banse X
Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Jun; 75(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the viscoelastic properties of bone grafts.
Datta A; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 16713046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A hydroxyapatite graft substitute reduces subsidence in a femoral impaction grafting model.
Munro NA; Downing MR; Meakin JR; Lee AJ; Ashcroft GP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():246-52. PubMed ID: 16967033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
