These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1571486)

  • 1. Composite sonographic assessment of fetal health.
    Chamberlain P
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 4(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 1571486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated testing and management in fetal growth restriction.
    Turan S; Miller J; Baschat AA
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 32(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 18482621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment.
    Norman LA; Karp LE
    Am Fam Physician; 1986 Oct; 34(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 3532741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Management of pregnancy complicated by intrauterine fetal growth restriction].
    Ropacka-Lesiak M; Breborowicz G
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 May; 83(5):373-6. PubMed ID: 22708336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amniotic fluid volume as a predictor of fetal distress in intrauterine growth retardation.
    Tongsong T; Srisomboon J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Feb; 40(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 8094682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Possibility of predicting intrauterine fetal growth retardation by a single ultrasonic examination (using varying standards)].
    Fedorova MV; Kotov IuB; Lukashenko SIu; Alekseevskiĭ AV; Dub NV; Sichinava LG; Novikova SV; Klimenko PA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 May; (5):15-9. PubMed ID: 1897665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance.
    Eden RD; Seifert LS; Kodack LD; Trofatter KF; Killam AP; Gall SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):365-9. PubMed ID: 3279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths.
    Manning FA; Morrison I; Harman CR; Lange IR; Menticoglou S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):880-4. PubMed ID: 3674161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation.
    Doubilet PM; Benson CB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):709-17. PubMed ID: 7863900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preface. Fetal monitoring.
    Odibo AO; Macones GA
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):xiii-xiv. PubMed ID: 21353085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The correlation in antepartum fetal test between full fetal biophysical profile (FBP) and rapid biophysical profile (rBPP).
    Phattanachindakun B; Boonyagulsrirung T; Chanprapaph P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):759-64. PubMed ID: 20649052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple assessment techniques evaluate antepartum fetal risks.
    Bobby P
    Pediatr Ann; 2003 Sep; 32(9):609-16. PubMed ID: 14508894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal testing in intra-uterine growth retardation.
    Snijders R; Hyett J
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 9(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 9204228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prenatal management of isolated IUGR].
    Senat MV; Tsatsaris V
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):941-65. PubMed ID: 24216302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
    Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound evaluation of amniotic fluid volume. I. The relationship of marginal and decreased amniotic fluid volumes to perinatal outcome.
    Chamberlain PF; Manning FA; Morrison I; Harman CR; Lange IR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Oct; 150(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 6385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal biophysical profile in twin gestations.
    Lodeiro JG; Vintzileos AM; Feinstein SJ; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):824-7. PubMed ID: 3517725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.