These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15714926)

  • 1. Improving the accuracy of a photographic assessment system for breast cosmesis.
    Christie D; Sharpley C; Curtis T
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2005 Feb; 17(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 15714926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposal for a gold standard for cosmetic evaluation after breast conserving therapy: Results from the St George and Wollongong Breast Boost trial.
    Merie R; Browne L; Cardoso JS; Cardoso MJ; Chin Y; Clark C; Graham P; Szwajcer A; Hau E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 61(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 28834326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing breast cosmesis after radiotherapy: what do we want to measure?
    Yarnold J
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2005 Feb; 17(1):25-6. PubMed ID: 15714925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New objective method in reporting the breast cosmesis after breast-conservative treatment based on nonstandardized photographs: The Objective Breast Cosmesis Scale.
    Soror T; Kovács G; Kovács Á; Seibold N; Melchert C; Baumann K; Wenzel E; Stojanovic-Rundic S
    Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 27475485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment.
    Cardoso MJ; Cardoso J; Amaral N; Azevedo I; Barreau L; Bernardo M; Christie D; Costa S; Fitzal F; Fougo JL; Johansen J; Macmillan D; Mano MP; Regolo L; Rosa J; Teixeira L; Vrieling C
    Breast; 2007 Oct; 16(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 17606373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy.
    Racz JM; Hong NL; Latosinsky S
    Breast J; 2015; 21(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 25940058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life.
    Dahlbäck C; Ringberg A; Manjer J
    Br J Surg; 2019 Jan; 106(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 30160774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
    Vrieling C; Collette L; Bartelink E; Borger JH; Brenninkmeyer SJ; Horiot JC; Pierart M; Poortmans PM; Struikmans H; Van der Schueren E; Van Dongen JA; Van Limbergen E; Bartelink H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 10524421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation.
    Al-Ghazal SK; Blamey RW; Stewart J; Morgan AA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1999 Dec; 25(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 10556000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiotherapy breast boost with reduced whole-breast dose is associated with improved cosmesis: the results of a comprehensive assessment from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial.
    Hau E; Browne LH; Khanna S; Cail S; Cert G; Chin Y; Clark C; Inder S; Szwajcer A; Graham PH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):682-9. PubMed ID: 21255943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis.
    Fitzal F; Krois W; Trischler H; Wutzel L; Riedl O; Kühbelböck U; Wintersteiner B; Cardoso MJ; Dubsky P; Gnant M; Jakesz R; Wild T
    Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 17382546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nipple-areolar preservation during breast-conserving therapy for subareolar breast carcinomas.
    Dale PS; Giuliano AE
    Arch Surg; 1996 Apr; 131(4):430-3. PubMed ID: 8615731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated calculation of ptosis on lateral clinical photographs.
    Lee J; Kim E; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Beahm EK; Markey MK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Oct; 21(5):900-10. PubMed ID: 26083280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation into digital imaging in assessing cosmetic outcome after breast surgery.
    Eadie C; Herd A; Stallard S
    J Audiov Media Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10829368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is face-only photographic view enough for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment?
    Cardoso MJ; Magalhães A; Almeida T; Costa S; Vrieling C; Christie D; Johansen J; Cardoso JS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):565-8. PubMed ID: 18204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast-conserving therapy in patients with a relatively large (T2 or T3) breast cancer: long-term local control and cosmetic outcome of a feasibility study.
    Woerdeman LA; Hage JJ; Thio EA; Zoetmulder FA; Rutgers EJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1607-16. PubMed ID: 15114120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: Cosmetic results and options for delayed reconstruction.
    Negenborn VL; Volders JH; Krekel NMA; Haloua MH; Bouman MB; Buncamper ME; Niessen FB; Winters HAH; Terwee CB; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Oct; 70(10):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 28610896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conserving surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer.
    Al-Ghazal SK; Fallowfield L; Blamey RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1999 Aug; 25(4):344-6. PubMed ID: 10419701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast.
    Ueda S; Tamaki Y; Yano K; Okishiro N; Yanagisawa T; Imasato M; Shimazu K; Kim SJ; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
    Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):414-25. PubMed ID: 18291263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.