These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15715063)

  • 41. Hearing tests are just child's play: the sound scouts game for children entering school.
    Dillon H; Mee C; Moreno JC; Seymour J
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):529-537. PubMed ID: 29703099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sound source localization using hearing aids with microphones placed behind-the-ear, in-the-canal, and in-the-pinna.
    Van den Bogaert T; Carette E; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):164-76. PubMed ID: 21208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Interventions following hearing screening in adults: a systematic descriptive review.
    Pronk M; Kramer SE; Davis AC; Stephens D; Smith PA; Thodi C; Anteunis LJ; Parazzini M; Grandori F
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):594-609. PubMed ID: 21718228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
    Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Should you be screened for a hearing problem? When to get tested so you don't miss out on the sounds around you.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Jan; 20(5):3. PubMed ID: 23757787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Analysis of compressive properties of the BioAid hearing aid algorithm.
    Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S130-S138. PubMed ID: 28942716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of two hearing screening programs in the same population: oto-acoustic emissions (OAE) screening in newborns and behavioral screening when infants.
    Geal-Dor M; Adelman C; Levi H; Zentner G; Stein-Zamir C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 74(12):1351-5. PubMed ID: 20869779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Audiological protocol in infantile rehabilitation].
    Veronesi A; Branchini V
    Minerva Pediatr; 1982 Dec; 34(23-24):1029-31. PubMed ID: 7162501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Medical management of childhood hearing loss.
    Kenna MA
    Pediatr Ann; 2004 Dec; 33(12):822-32. PubMed ID: 15615309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Phantom responses and early auditory evoked potentials. Comparison of the TDH39 hearing aid and an intra-canal hearing device].
    Jezequel JA
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(4):151-7. PubMed ID: 7574242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The BOEL test should be excluded as a hearing screening test!].
    Konrádsson KS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(36):3071. PubMed ID: 15387302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Selecting the gain for radio microphone (FM) systems: theoretical considerations and practical limitations.
    Rowson VJ; Bamford JM
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Jun; 29(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 8574202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hearing configuration in children with cCMV infection and proposal of a flow chart for hearing evaluation.
    Foulon I; Vleurinck L; Kerkhofs K; Gordts F
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):714-9. PubMed ID: 26068302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).
    Meis M; Huber R; Fischer RL; Schulte M; Spilski J; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S118-S129. PubMed ID: 27875658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements.
    Ickes MA; Hawkins DB; Cooper WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Jul; 2(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 1768884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Early hearing screening, detection and intervention (EHDI) in Rhode Island.
    Vohr B; Simon P; McDermott C; Kurtzer-White E; Johnson MJ; Topol D
    Med Health R I; 2002 Dec; 85(12):369-72. PubMed ID: 12593355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Examining the validity of the finger rub/finger tap screening test for the early detection of age-related hearing loss].
    Sano T; Morita K; Okuyama Y; Ito N; Osada H
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2018; 65(6):288-299. PubMed ID: 29962448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A test suite for hearing aid evaluation.
    Kates JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(3):255-78. PubMed ID: 2401957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. From electric acoustic stimulation to improved sound coding in cochlear implants.
    Nopp P; Polak M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():88-95. PubMed ID: 19955725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion.
    Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Maas P; Nielsen C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 21275499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.