130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15715065)
1. A tutorial on complex sound fields for audiometric testing.
Ghent RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15715065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of auditory functions for Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers.
Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Beaulieu MA; Legault JP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):313-31. PubMed ID: 21864470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.
Souza PE; Tremblay KL
Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):119-43. PubMed ID: 16959734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of spatial separation of speech and noise sources on the optimal setting of the master hearing aid.
Lawrence DW; Franks JR
J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 738914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
Mens LH
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors which affect measures of speech audibility with hearing aids.
Popelka GR; Mason DI
Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):109S-118S. PubMed ID: 3678649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results.
Kunst SJ; Leijendeckers JM; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech audiometry and fitting of hearing aids in noise.
Niemeyer W
Audiology; 1976; 15(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 938348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sound field measurement tutorial. Working Group on Sound Field Calibration of the Committee on Audiologic Evaluation American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
ASHA Suppl; 1991 Jan; (3):25-38. PubMed ID: 1672069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 58(4):1363-76. PubMed ID: 26090648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a test environment to evaluate performance of modern hearing aid features.
Nilsson M; Ghent RM; Bray V; Harris R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 15715066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
