These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15715466)

  • 21. Efficient electrostatic solvation model for protein-fragment docking.
    Majeux N; Scarsi M; Caflisch A
    Proteins; 2001 Feb; 42(2):256-68. PubMed ID: 11119650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
    Islam MA; Pillay TS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ReFlexIn: a flexible receptor protein-ligand docking scheme evaluated on HIV-1 protease.
    Leis S; Zacharias M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48008. PubMed ID: 23110159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic and efficient decomposition of two-dimensional structures of small molecules for fragment-based high-throughput docking.
    Kolb P; Caflisch A
    J Med Chem; 2006 Dec; 49(25):7384-92. PubMed ID: 17149868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling.
    Schafferhans A; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(1):407-27. PubMed ID: 11243828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields.
    Radestock S; Böhm M; Gohlke H
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5466-79. PubMed ID: 16107145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.
    Jain AN
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):947-61. PubMed ID: 14761196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools.
    Schulz-Gasch T; Stahl M
    J Mol Model; 2003 Feb; 9(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 12638011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures.
    Knegtel RM; Kuntz ID; Oshiro CM
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Feb; 266(2):424-40. PubMed ID: 9047373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fragment-based lead discovery using X-ray crystallography.
    Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Cleasby A; Frederickson M; Tickle IJ; Jhoti H
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jan; 48(2):403-13. PubMed ID: 15658854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using AutoDock for ligand-receptor docking.
    Morris GM; Huey R; Olson AJ
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; Chapter 8():Unit 8.14. PubMed ID: 19085980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Supercomputer investigation of the protein-ligand system low-energy minima].
    Oferkin IV; Sulimov AV; Katkova EV; Kutov DK; Grigoriev FV; Kondakova OA; Sulimov VB
    Biomed Khim; 2015; 61(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 26716742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.