These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15715907)

  • 1. Statistical model of natural stimuli predicts edge-like pooling of spatial frequency channels in V2.
    Hyvärinen A; Gutmann M; Hoyer PO
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 6():12. PubMed ID: 15715907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Hierarchical Statistical Model of Natural Images Explains Tuning Properties in V2.
    Hosoya H; Hyvärinen A
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(29):10412-28. PubMed ID: 26203137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical maps of separable tuning properties predict population responses to complex visual stimuli.
    Baker TI; Issa NP
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):775-87. PubMed ID: 15758052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural image sequences constrain dynamic receptive fields and imply a sparse code.
    Häusler C; Susemihl A; Nawrot MP
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1536():53-67. PubMed ID: 23933349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical models of natural images and cortical visual representation.
    Hyvärinen A
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Apr; 2(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 25163788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images.
    Hyvärinen A; Hoyer PO
    Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(18):2413-23. PubMed ID: 11459597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images.
    Olshausen BA; Field DJ
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6583):607-9. PubMed ID: 8637596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quadratic forms in natural images.
    Hashimoto W
    Network; 2003 Nov; 14(4):765-88. PubMed ID: 14653502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A two-layer model of natural stimuli estimated with score matching.
    Köster U; Hyvärinen A
    Neural Comput; 2010 Sep; 22(9):2308-33. PubMed ID: 20569179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of visual receptive field properties of the superior colliculus and primary visual cortex in rats.
    Li X; Sun C; Shi L
    Brain Res Bull; 2015 Aug; 117():69-80. PubMed ID: 26222378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear and extra-classical receptive field properties and the statistics of natural scenes.
    Zetzsche C; Röhrbein F
    Network; 2001 Aug; 12(3):331-50. PubMed ID: 11563533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial and temporal frequency tuning in striate cortex: functional uniformity and specializations related to receptive field eccentricity.
    Yu HH; Verma R; Yang Y; Tibballs HA; Lui LL; Reser DH; Rosa MG
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 31(6):1043-62. PubMed ID: 20377618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex.
    van Hateren JH; Ruderman DL
    Proc Biol Sci; 1998 Dec; 265(1412):2315-20. PubMed ID: 9881476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images.
    Touryan J; Felsen G; Dan Y
    Neuron; 2005 Mar; 45(5):781-91. PubMed ID: 15748852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complex cell pooling and the statistics of natural images.
    Hyvärinen A; Köster U
    Network; 2007 Jun; 18(2):81-100. PubMed ID: 17852755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral receptive field properties explain shape selectivity in area V4.
    David SV; Hayden BY; Gallant JL
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 96(6):3492-505. PubMed ID: 16987926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of localized oriented receptive fields by learning a translation-invariant code for natural images.
    Rao RP; Ballard DH
    Network; 1998 May; 9(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 9861987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear V1 responses to natural scenes revealed by neural network analysis.
    Prenger R; Wu MC; David SV; Gallant JL
    Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):663-79. PubMed ID: 15288891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal and spatiotemporal coherence in simple-cell responses: a generative model of natural image sequences.
    Hurri J; Hyvärinen A
    Network; 2003 Aug; 14(3):527-51. PubMed ID: 12938770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning receptive fields using predictive feedback.
    Jehee JF; Rothkopf C; Beck JM; Ballard DH
    J Physiol Paris; 2006; 100(1-3):125-32. PubMed ID: 17067787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.