These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15716149)

  • 1. The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.
    Xu Y; Liu J; Kanwisher N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):588-97. PubMed ID: 15716149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
    Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes.
    Rossion B; Collins D; Goffaux V; Curran T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):543-55. PubMed ID: 17335400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jan; 17(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 16436684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid adaptation of the m170 response: importance of face parts.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 17573371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
    Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face recognition and cortical responses: effect of stimulus duration.
    Tanskanen T; Näsänen R; Ojanpää H; Hari R
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1636-44. PubMed ID: 17412612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
    Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing.
    Gauthier I; Curran T; Curby KM; Collins D
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 12627167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG-MEG evidence for early differential repetition effects for fearful, happy and neutral faces.
    Morel S; Ponz A; Mercier M; Vuilleumier P; George N
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1254():84-98. PubMed ID: 19073158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endogenous context for visual processing of human faces and other objects.
    Braeutigam S; Swithenby SJ
    Neuroreport; 2003 Jul; 14(10):1385-9. PubMed ID: 12876479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
    Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification.
    Grill-Spector K; Knouf N; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 May; 7(5):555-62. PubMed ID: 15077112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal dissociation between spatial attention and sensory competition during human face processing.
    Jacques C; Rossion B
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 May; 17(5):1055-65. PubMed ID: 16772314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing.
    Lueschow A; Sander T; Boehm SG; Nolte G; Trahms L; Curio G
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 15102119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face processing in the brains of pre-school aged children measured with MEG.
    He W; Brock J; Johnson BW
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():317-27. PubMed ID: 25463467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
    Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face-sensitive brain responses measured from a four-year-old child with a custom-sized child MEG system.
    He W; Brock J; Johnson BW
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():213-7. PubMed ID: 24295557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.