223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15716849)
21. Effects of four instruments on coronal pre-enlargement by using cone beam computed tomography.
Sanfelice CM; da Costa FB; Reis Só MV; Vier-Pelisser F; Souza Bier CA; Grecca FS
J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):858-61. PubMed ID: 20416433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dimension, anatomy and morphology of the mesiobuccal root canal system in maxillary molars.
Degerness RA; Bowles WR
J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):985-9. PubMed ID: 20478451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of dentine thickness of middle mesial canals of mandibular molars prepared with rotary instruments: a micro-CT study.
Keles A; Keskin C; Alqawasmi R; Versiani MA
Int Endod J; 2020 Apr; 53(4):519-528. PubMed ID: 31705697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals.
Suter B; Lussi A; Sequeira P
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 15667633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The degrees and configurations of mesial canal curvatures of mandibular first molars.
Kartal N; Cimilli HK
J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):358-62. PubMed ID: 9545943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars.
Yoldas O; Oztunc H; Tinaz C; Alparslan N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 15088037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: an endodontic challenge.
De Moor RJ; Deroose CA; Calberson FL
Int Endod J; 2004 Nov; 37(11):789-99. PubMed ID: 15479262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An evaluation of the Canal Master, balanced force, and step-back techniques.
Hankins PJ; ElDeeb ME
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8618093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Periapical radiographs overestimate root canal wall thickness during post space preparation.
Souza EM; Bretas RT; Cenci MS; Maia-Filho EM; Bonetti-Filho I
Int Endod J; 2008 Aug; 41(8):658-63. PubMed ID: 18479369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stress analysis of human tooth root using various root canal instruments.
Mayhew JT; Eleazer PD; Hnat WP
J Endod; 2000 Sep; 26(9):523-4. PubMed ID: 11199793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
Campos JM; del Rio C
J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extended apical enlargement with hand files versus rotary NiTi files. Part II.
Bartha T; Kalwitzki M; Löst C; Weiger R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):692-7. PubMed ID: 17052649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
