160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15717938)
21. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Burke P; Visioli C; Paci E; Zappa M
Br J Cancer; 2003 Nov; 89(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 14583763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two commercial systems for computer-assisted detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms.
Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Brancato B; Catarzi S; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M
Radiol Med; 2004; 107(5-6):480-8. PubMed ID: 15195010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions.
Pauli R; Hammond S; Cooke J; Ansell J
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):10-4. PubMed ID: 8785616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 10572847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of Using the Same vs Different Order for Second Readings of Screening Mammograms on Rates of Breast Cancer Detection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Taylor-Phillips S; Wallis MG; Jenkinson D; Adekanmbi V; Parsons H; Dunn J; Stallard N; Szczepura A; Gates S; Kearins O; Duncan A; Hudson S; Clarke A
JAMA; 2016 May; 315(18):1956-65. PubMed ID: 27163985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A pilot evaluation of the R2 image checker system and users' response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screening films.
Garvican L; Field S
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):833-7. PubMed ID: 11895300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
Gromet M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience.
Hukkinen K; Vehmas T; Pamilo M; Kivisaari L
Acta Radiol; 2006 Apr; 47(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 16613306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support.
Samulski M; Hupse R; Boetes C; Mus RD; den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N
Eur Radiol; 2010 Oct; 20(10):2323-30. PubMed ID: 20532890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?
James JJ; Cornford EJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Jan; 64(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 19070697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of cancers detected on double reading by one reader only.
Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Collini G; Cruciani A; Ercolini E; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M
Breast; 2006 Aug; 15(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 16236517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
