These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15718116)

  • 21. Organizing the clinical data in the medical record.
    Bolens M; Borst F; Scherrer JR
    MD Comput; 1992; 9(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 1630289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Guidelines for the uniform reporting of data for Medical Emergency Teams.
    Cretikos M; Parr M; Hillman K; Bishop G; Brown D; Daffurn K; Dinh H; Francis N; Heath T; Hill G; Murphy J; Sanchez D; Santiano N; Young L
    Resuscitation; 2006 Jan; 68(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 16153768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variation in the transcription of laboratory data in an intensive care unit.
    Black R; Woolman P; Kinsella J
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Aug; 59(8):767-9. PubMed ID: 15270967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Antibiotic allergies in the medical record: effect on drug selection and assessment of validity.
    Lutomski DM; Lafollette JA; Biaglow MA; Haglund LA
    Pharmacotherapy; 2008 Nov; 28(11):1348-53. PubMed ID: 18956995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does concordance between data sources vary by medical organization type?
    Tisnado DM; Adams JL; Liu H; Damberg CL; Hu A; Chen WP; Kahn KL
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Jun; 13(6 Part 1):289-96. PubMed ID: 17567226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [How to put real medical records into computer? Data collection per notion].
    Martin JM; Martin J
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Nov; 28(9):593-603. PubMed ID: 7003507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The quality of medical records: a retrospective study in Lazio Region, Italy].
    Cardo S; Agabiti N; Picconi O; Scarinci M; Papini P; Guasticchi G; Gentile D; Forastiere F; Arcà M; Volpe M; Perucci CA
    Ann Ig; 2003; 15(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 14969296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DADOS-Survey: an open-source application for CHERRIES-compliant Web surveys.
    Shah A; Jacobs DO; Martins H; Harker M; Menezes A; McCready M; Pietrobon R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Sep; 6():34. PubMed ID: 16978409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outpatient Osteopathic SOAP Note Form: preliminary results in osteopathic outcomes-based research.
    Sleszynski SL; Glonek T
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2005 Apr; 105(4):181-205. PubMed ID: 15928337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of observed versus documented physician assessment and treatment of pain: the physician record does not reflect the reality.
    Chisholm CD; Weaver CS; Whenmouth LF; Giles B; Brizendine EJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 52(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 18339446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics.
    Roukema J; Los RK; Bleeker SE; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Moll HA
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16396855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Advanced statistics: understanding medical record review (MRR) studies.
    Worster A; Haines T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Feb; 11(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 14759964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survey research in dermatology: guidelines for success.
    Asarch A; Chiu A; Kimball AB; Dellavalle RP
    Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):121-31, vi. PubMed ID: 19254655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of data taken from medical charts.
    Canfield M; Clarkin J; Coyne L; Grob M
    Psychiatr Hosp; 1986; 17(4):173-9. PubMed ID: 10282439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Secondary prevention for acute coronary syndrome in rural South Australia: are drugs best? What about the rest?
    Wachtel TM; Kucia AM; Greenhill JA
    Rural Remote Health; 2008; 8(4):967. PubMed ID: 18855517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anaesthesia record system on handheld computers--pilot experience and uses for quality control and clinical guidelines.
    Fu Q; Xue Z; Zhu J; Fors U; Klein G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Feb; 77(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 15652637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
    Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assurance and data collection: current status, problems, and pitfalls.
    Caldwell FS
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Aug; 60(8):35-8. PubMed ID: 10313282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.