278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15718117)
1. Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity.
Lofthus CM; Cappelen I; Osnes EK; Falch JA; Kristiansen IS; Medhus AW; Nordsletten L; Meyer HE
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 15718117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limitations of electronic databases: a caution.
Svenson JE; Pollack SH; Fallat ME; Drapeau JL
J Ky Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 101(3):109-12. PubMed ID: 12674902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological challenges in hip fracture registration: the Harstad Injury Registry.
Emaus N; Heiberg I; Ahmed LA; Balteskard L; Jacobsen BK; Magnus T; Olsen LR; Ytterstad B
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2011 Jun; 18(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 21432705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [An evaluation of the National Patient Register. A study of validity of some abortion diagnoses].
Schmidt L; Damsgaard MT; Nielsen JM
Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Dec; 151(51):3478-82. PubMed ID: 2609461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [IT systems for clinical databases--status and perspectives].
Vingtoft S; Jensen LP; Madsen I; Nielsen PH; Kverneland A; Kjaergaard J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Sep; 164(38):4398-405. PubMed ID: 12362730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations.
Gjertsen JE; Engesaeter LB; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Steindal K; Vinje T; Fevang JM
Acta Orthop; 2008 Oct; 79(5):583-93. PubMed ID: 18839363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [SAMDATA--hospital statistics without quality assurance].
Lund E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Jan; 112(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 1553651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of hospital-discharge data.
Patten SB
Can J Psychiatry; 1999 Mar; 44(2):188-9. PubMed ID: 10097842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Veteran's affairs hospital discharge databases coded serious bacterial infections accurately.
Schneeweiss S; Robicsek A; Scranton R; Zuckerman D; Solomon DH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):397-409. PubMed ID: 17346615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structured electronic template for histopathology reports on colorectal carcinomas: a joint project by the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Society for Pathology.
Bjugn R; Casati B; Norstein J
Hum Pathol; 2008 Mar; 39(3):359-67. PubMed ID: 18187180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a centrally maintained computerized hospital database: comparison with operating room logbooks.
Pilpel D; Fraser GM; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
Isr J Med Sci; 1993 May; 29(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 8314689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National Orthopedic Registry in Malaysia--National Orthopedic Hip Fracture Database (NOHFD).
Muhammad Anwar Hau A
Med J Malaysia; 2008 Sep; 63 Suppl C():74. PubMed ID: 19227678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Tromsø study: registration of fractures, how good are self-reports, a computerized radiographic register and a discharge register?
Joakimsen RM; Fønnebø V; Søgaard AJ; Tollan A; Størmer J; Magnus JH
Osteoporos Int; 2001 Dec; 12(12):1001-5. PubMed ID: 11846324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health care information processing: how accurate are the data?
Chewning SJ; Nussman DS; Griffo ML; Kiebzak GM
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 9090620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Can we rely on Norwegian surgery data? A quality control at central and local hospitals of the procedure codes used in the survey on organization of gastrointestinal cancer surgery].
Kindseth O; Ostensen H; Soreide O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Aug; 115(20):2555-8. PubMed ID: 7676422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A validation of the diagnosis of obstetric sphincter tears in two Norwegian databases, the Medical Birth Registry and the Patient Administration System.
Baghestan E; Børdahl PE; Rasmussen SA; Sande AK; Lyslo I; Solvang I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 17364284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Databases for hip fracture audit.
Parker MJ
Acta Orthop; 2008 Oct; 79(5):577-9. PubMed ID: 18836963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.
Jack RH; Linklater KM; Hofman D; Fitzpatrick J; Møller H
BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():281. PubMed ID: 17096838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The incidence of hip fractures in Norway -accuracy of the national Norwegian patient registry.
Høiberg MP; Gram J; Hermann P; Brixen K; Haugeberg G
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Nov; 15():372. PubMed ID: 25394865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
