394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15718121)
1. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
Hopewell S; Wolfenden L; Clarke M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 18411039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The evidence for nursing interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Mistiaen P; Poot E; Hickox S; Wagner C
Nurse Res; 2004; 12(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 15636007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in The Cochrane Library.
Wiffen PJ
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2004; 18(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 15148011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.
Sampson M; McGowan J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1057-63. PubMed ID: 16980145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
French SD; McDonald S; McKenzie JE; Green SE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Oct; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16225692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews.
Lawson ML; Pham B; Klassen TP; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 16018912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Systematic reviews on infectious diseases. The Cochrane Collaboration].
Bonfill X; Martà J
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999; 17 Suppl 2():15-21. PubMed ID: 10605185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic reviews--triumph of form over substance?
Thomas L; Wilson JA
Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):492-5. PubMed ID: 17184452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
