126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15718380)
1. Cat dissection vs. sculpting human structures in clay: an analysis of two approaches to undergraduate human anatomy laboratory education.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Mar; 29(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15718380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology.
DeHoff ME; Clark KL; Meganathan K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Mar; 35(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21386004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The implementation of clay modeling and rat dissection into the human anatomy and physiology curriculum of a large urban community college.
Haspel C; Motoike HK; Lenchner E
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23650279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study.
Motoike HK; O'Kane RL; Lenchner E; Haspel C
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 19189347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenges and implementation of the German maternity protection act for female medical students in macroscopic anatomical education.
Kulisch C; Langheinrich J; Heuckendorf E; Vida I; Brunk I
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(2):Doc17. PubMed ID: 32328519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissection versus Prosection: A Comparative Assessment of the Course Experiences, Approaches to Learning, and Academic Performance of Non-medical Undergraduate Students in Human Anatomy.
McWatt SC; Newton GS; Umphrey GJ; Jadeski LC
Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Mar; 14(2):184-200. PubMed ID: 32539226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Student-Perceived Value on the Use of Clay Modelling in Undergraduate Clinical Anatomy.
Correia JC; Baatjes KJ; Meyer I
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1388():153-170. PubMed ID: 36104620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience from an optional dissection course in a clinically-orientated concept to complement system-based anatomy in a reformed curriculum.
Eppler E; Serowy S; Link K; Filgueira L
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 28608954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital report in an anatomy laboratory: a new method for team-based dissection, reporting, and evaluation.
Oh CS; Kim KJ; Chung E; Choi HJ
Surg Radiol Anat; 2015 Apr; 37(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 25064605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating dissection in the gross anatomy course: Correlation between quality of laboratory dissection and students outcomes.
Nwachukwu C; Lachman N; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 24799441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the effectiveness of dissection and prosection on short-term anatomic knowledge retention in a reciprocal peer-teaching program.
Lackey-Cornelison WL; Bauler LD; Smith J
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Jun; 44(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 32412383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilizing Medical Students as Internal Assets to Enhance Gross Anatomy Laboratory Learning.
Williams SE; Hawkins HG; Khalil MK
Clin Anat; 2020 Mar; 33(2):286-292. PubMed ID: 31688953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomy by Whole Body Dissection as an Elective: Student Outcomes.
Huynh N; Burgess A; Wing L; Mellis C
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32958420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
Granger NA; Calleson D
Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of gross anatomy laboratory on student written examination performance: A 3-year study of a large-enrollment undergraduate anatomy course.
Anderson H; Weil JA; Tucker RP; Gross DS
Anat Sci Educ; 2024; 17(1):114-127. PubMed ID: 37602570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy.
Shiozawa T; Butz B; Herlan S; Kramer A; Hirt B
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27273871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
