547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15719189)
1. Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study comparing handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis.
Laurent A; Parc Y; McNamara D; Parc R; Tiret E
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):729-34. PubMed ID: 15719189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.
Jiang JK; Yang SH; Lin JK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Nov; 48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. PubMed ID: 16132480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes for patients developing anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: does a handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis matter?
Lian L; Kiran RP; Remzi FH; Lavery IC; Fazio VW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Mar; 52(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 19333036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early postoperative complications after stapled vs handsewn restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 148 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli: a matched-pair analysis.
Ganschow P; Warth R; Hinz U; Büchler MW; Kadmon M
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 16(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23941307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of functional and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colonic J-pouch versus straight reconstruction after total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer.
Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH; Huang KC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):1972-9. PubMed ID: 17431725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Ziv Y; Fazio VW; Church JM; Lavery IC; King TM; Ambrosetti P
Am J Surg; 1996 Mar; 171(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 8615465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy.
Hallgren TA; Fasth SB; Oresland TO; Hultén LA
Eur J Surg; 1995 Dec; 161(12):915-21. PubMed ID: 8775636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Total mesorectal excison and colonic-J-pouch-anal anastomosis in the therapy of low rectal carcinoma--results in 116 patients].
Ommer A; Girona-Johannkemper M; Jung KP; Berg E
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Sep; 127(9):775-80. PubMed ID: 12221559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection.
Remzi FH; Fazio VW; Gorgun E; Zutshi M; Church JM; Lavery IC; Hull TL
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 15785900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis with J-colonic pouch for rectal cancer.
Santoro GA; Makhdoomi KR; Eitan BZ; Bartolo DC
Ann Ital Chir; 1998; 69(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9835124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?
Schluender SJ; Mei L; Yang H; Fleshner PR
Am Surg; 2006 Oct; 72(10):912-6. PubMed ID: 17058734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
Machado M; Nygren J; Goldman S; Ljungqvist O
Ann Surg; 2003 Aug; 238(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 12894014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery.
Resegotti A; Astegiano M; Farina EC; Ciccone G; Avagnina G; Giustetto A; Campra D; Fronda GR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15719193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual rectal mucosa after stapled vs. handsewn ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP)--a critical issue.
Ganschow P; Treiber I; Hinz U; Leowardi C; Büchler MW; Kadmon M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2015 Feb; 400(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 25586093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
Temple LK; Bacik J; Savatta SG; Gottesman L; Paty PB; Weiser MR; Guillem JG; Minsky BD; Kalman M; Thaler HT; Schrag D; Wong WD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jul; 48(7):1353-65. PubMed ID: 15868235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pouch design and long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
Block M; Börjesson L; Lindholm E; Oresland T
Br J Surg; 2009 May; 96(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 19358173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma rectum.
Sarker SK; Chaudhry R; Sinha VK
Indian J Cancer; 1994 Jun; 31(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 7927447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trails].
Peng J; Zhan W; Zhao X; Wang J; Alain AH; Ma J; Lin A
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 40(12):905-8. PubMed ID: 12654206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of technical factors on outcome of restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.
von Roon AC; Tekkis PP; Clark SK; Heriot AG; Lovegrove RE; Truvolo S; Nicholls RJ; Phillips RK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):952-61. PubMed ID: 17464542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
