These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15719189)

  • 1. Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study comparing handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis.
    Laurent A; Parc Y; McNamara D; Parc R; Tiret E
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):729-34. PubMed ID: 15719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Selvindos PB; Ho YH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.
    Jiang JK; Yang SH; Lin JK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Nov; 48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. PubMed ID: 16132480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes for patients developing anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: does a handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis matter?
    Lian L; Kiran RP; Remzi FH; Lavery IC; Fazio VW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Mar; 52(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 19333036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early postoperative complications after stapled vs handsewn restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 148 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli: a matched-pair analysis.
    Ganschow P; Warth R; Hinz U; Büchler MW; Kadmon M
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Feb; 16(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 23941307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of functional and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colonic J-pouch versus straight reconstruction after total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer.
    Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH; Huang KC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):1972-9. PubMed ID: 17431725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis.
    Ziv Y; Fazio VW; Church JM; Lavery IC; King TM; Ambrosetti P
    Am J Surg; 1996 Mar; 171(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 8615465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy.
    Hallgren TA; Fasth SB; Oresland TO; Hultén LA
    Eur J Surg; 1995 Dec; 161(12):915-21. PubMed ID: 8775636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Total mesorectal excison and colonic-J-pouch-anal anastomosis in the therapy of low rectal carcinoma--results in 116 patients].
    Ommer A; Girona-Johannkemper M; Jung KP; Berg E
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Sep; 127(9):775-80. PubMed ID: 12221559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection.
    Remzi FH; Fazio VW; Gorgun E; Zutshi M; Church JM; Lavery IC; Hull TL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 15785900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis with J-colonic pouch for rectal cancer.
    Santoro GA; Makhdoomi KR; Eitan BZ; Bartolo DC
    Ann Ital Chir; 1998; 69(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9835124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can a meta-analysis answer the question: is mucosectomy and handsewn or double-stapled anastomosis better in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?
    Schluender SJ; Mei L; Yang H; Fleshner PR
    Am Surg; 2006 Oct; 72(10):912-6. PubMed ID: 17058734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
    Machado M; Nygren J; Goldman S; Ljungqvist O
    Ann Surg; 2003 Aug; 238(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 12894014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery.
    Resegotti A; Astegiano M; Farina EC; Ciccone G; Avagnina G; Giustetto A; Campra D; Fronda GR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Mar; 48(3):464-8. PubMed ID: 15719193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Residual rectal mucosa after stapled vs. handsewn ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP)--a critical issue.
    Ganschow P; Treiber I; Hinz U; Leowardi C; Büchler MW; Kadmon M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2015 Feb; 400(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 25586093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.
    Temple LK; Bacik J; Savatta SG; Gottesman L; Paty PB; Weiser MR; Guillem JG; Minsky BD; Kalman M; Thaler HT; Schrag D; Wong WD
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jul; 48(7):1353-65. PubMed ID: 15868235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pouch design and long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Block M; Börjesson L; Lindholm E; Oresland T
    Br J Surg; 2009 May; 96(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 19358173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma rectum.
    Sarker SK; Chaudhry R; Sinha VK
    Indian J Cancer; 1994 Jun; 31(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 7927447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trails].
    Peng J; Zhan W; Zhao X; Wang J; Alain AH; Ma J; Lin A
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 40(12):905-8. PubMed ID: 12654206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of technical factors on outcome of restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis.
    von Roon AC; Tekkis PP; Clark SK; Heriot AG; Lovegrove RE; Truvolo S; Nicholls RJ; Phillips RK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):952-61. PubMed ID: 17464542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.