These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15719286)

  • 1. [Expertise test in the new Civil Prosecution Law (Law 1/2000)].
    Laborda Calvo E
    Neurologia; 2004 Dec; 19 Suppl 4():26-9. PubMed ID: 15719286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Medical expert opinion--credibility, ethics, remuneration].
    Sahar A
    Harefuah; 2007 Jul; 146(7):534-6, 574, 473. PubMed ID: 17803167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Compensation of medical experts in civil law proceedings].
    Louven K
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1983 Mar; 125(12):84-5 concl. PubMed ID: 6406849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Remarks about the position of the medico-legal expert in imperative regulations in the Penal and Civil Codes].
    Chowaniec C; Nowak A; Chowaniec M; Kobek M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 16498966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Expert advice in liability cases].
    Brands WG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 May; 116(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 19507415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ethical-legal frame and forensic expert's responsibility.
    Ciornea T; Scripcaru G; Alexandru E; Ianovici N
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1979; 83(4):569-71. PubMed ID: 550244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The principle of causality in criminal, civil and social law (author's transl)].
    Ludolph E
    Unfallchirurgie; 1981; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 7222279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle".
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The physician as the expert in civil legal suits].
    Weimar W
    Ther Ggw; 1981 Aug; 120(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 7292360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The status of psychiatric expert: a controversy].
    Pobocha J
    Psychiatr Pol; 1998; 32(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 9816898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Some issues of forensic medical expertise within civil processes in the light of provisions of the new civil procedural code of the Russian Federation].
    Pashinian GA; Romadonovskiĭ PO; Pashinian AG; Beliaeva EV; Tangieva TA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2004; 47(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 15523876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Topical issues of organisation and implementation of forensic medical expertise].
    Kapustin AV; Isaev AI
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2004; 47(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 15008086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert witness perceptions of bias in experts.
    Commons ML; Miller PM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 15497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Civil and criminal responsibility of epileptics].
    Villanueva F
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Mar; 25(139):429-34. PubMed ID: 9147782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [General principles in French law of medical expertise in civil matters].
    Fourcade J; Saury R
    Maroc Med; 1971 Oct; 51(550):562-78. PubMed ID: 5142655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality assurance by experts].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1998; 120(12):588-92. PubMed ID: 9916282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification.
    Loftus EF
    J Appl Psychol; 1980 Feb; 65(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 7364708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [From the expert's office: new jurisdiction in the German social law for the methodology in expert opinions].
    Drechsel-Schlund C; Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2008 Sep; 87(9):654-6. PubMed ID: 18726863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.