136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15719299)
1. [MRI of carotid stents: influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen].
Straube T; Wolf S; Flesser A; Deli M; Alfke K; Nabavi A; Jansen O
Rofo; 2005 Mar; 177(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 15719299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.
Frölich AM; Pilgram-Pastor SM; Psychogios MN; Mohr A; Knauth M
Neuroradiology; 2011 May; 53(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20721544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla.
Hähnel S; Nguyen-Trong TH; Rohde S; Hartmann M; Braun C; Sartor K; Heiland S
J Neuroradiol; 2006 Apr; 33(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16733419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1993-7. PubMed ID: 19749216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Off-resonance magnetic resonance angiography improves visualization of in-stent lumen in peripheral nitinol stents compared to conventional T1-weighted acquisitions: an in vitro comparison study.
Gitsioudis G; Fortner P; Stuber M; Missiou A; Andre F; Müller OJ; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 27535040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina.
Borisch I; Hamer OW; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Link J
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 May; 16(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 15872322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography can evaluate restenosis after carotid artery stenting with the Carotid Wallstent.
Kono K; Shintani A; Terada T
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Sep; 156(9):1713-9. PubMed ID: 24890936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artifact-free coronary magnetic resonance angiography and coronary vessel wall imaging in the presence of a new, metallic, coronary magnetic resonance imaging stent.
Spuentrup E; Ruebben A; Mahnken A; Stuber M; Kölker C; Nguyen TH; Günther RW; Buecker A
Circulation; 2005 Mar; 111(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 15723984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents.
Wang Y; Truong TN; Yen C; Bilecen D; Watts R; Trost DW; Prince MR
Magn Reson Med; 2003 May; 49(5):972-6. PubMed ID: 12704782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of blood-pool contrast media on MR imaging and flow measurements in the presence of pulmonary arterial stents in swine.
Kuehne T; Saeed M; Moore P; Gleason K; Reddy G; Teitel D; Higgins CB
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):439-45. PubMed ID: 11997550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.
Bartels LW; Smits HF; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Mar; 12(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11287516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro stent assessment by MRI: visibility of lumen and artifacts for 27 modern stents.
Heinrich A; Güttler FV; Schlesies F; Aschenbach R; Eckardt N; Teichgräber UK
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Nov; 62(6):565-573. PubMed ID: 27740912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].
Graf H; Klemm T; Lauer UA; Duda S; Claussen CD; Schick F
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1711-9. PubMed ID: 14661144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].
Reinhardt J; Nguyen-Trong TH; Hähnel S; Bellemann ME; Heiland S
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19995528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metallic renal artery MR imaging stent: artifact-free lumen visualization with projection and standard renal MR angiography.
Spuentrup E; Ruebben A; Stuber M; Günther RW; Buecker A
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):897-902. PubMed ID: 12773688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved in-stent magnetic resonance angiography with high flip angle excitation.
Meyer JM; Buecker A; Spuentrup E; Schuermann K; Huetten M; Hilgers RD; van Vaals JJ; Guenther RW
Invest Radiol; 2001 Nov; 36(11):677-81. PubMed ID: 11606845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow velocities after carotid artery stenting: impact of stent design. A fluid dynamics study in a carotid artery model with laser Doppler anemometry.
Greil O; Kleinschmidt T; Weiss W; Wolf O; Heider P; Schaffner S; Gianotti M; Schmid T; Liepsch D; Berger H
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 15602638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.
Maintz D; Kugel H; Schellhammer F; Landwehr P
Invest Radiol; 2001 Apr; 36(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 11283419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent.
Buecker A; Spuentrup E; Ruebben A; Günther RW
Circulation; 2002 Apr; 105(15):1772-5. PubMed ID: 11956117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Delivery and release of nitinol stent in carotid artery and their interactions: a finite element analysis.
Wu W; Qi M; Liu XP; Yang DZ; Wang WQ
J Biomech; 2007; 40(13):3034-40. PubMed ID: 17511995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]