433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15719315)
21. Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam.
Yazici AT; Bozkurt E; Alagoz C; Alagoz N; Pekel G; Kaya V; Yilmaz OF
J Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20163077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement.
Kawamorita T; Uozato H; Kamiya K; Bax L; Tsutsui K; Aizawa D; Shimizu K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 19101435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigation of the human anterior segment in normal Chinese subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.
Wang X; Wu Q
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):703-8. PubMed ID: 23260258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth.
Buehl W; Stojanac D; Sacu S; Drexler W; Findl O
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 141(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16386970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Corneal elevation and thickness in relation to the refractive status measured with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system.
Uçakhan OO; Gesoğlu P; Ozkan M; Kanpolat A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1900-5. PubMed ID: 19006736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements.
Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18165089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera after myopic excimer laser surgery.
Savini G; Barboni P; Profazio V; Zanini M; Hoffer KJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):809-13. PubMed ID: 18471637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Reproducibility of Scheimpflug Tomography Measurements Regarding Corneal Front and Back Surface Power].
Stavridis E; Eppig T; Szentmáry N; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Nov; 232(11):1297-303. PubMed ID: 26575536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intrasubject repeatability of corneal morphology measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system.
Montalbán R; Piñero DP; Javaloy J; Alió JL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):971-7. PubMed ID: 22541828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scheimpflug photography-based clinical characterization of the correlation of the corneal shape between the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in the normal human eye.
Montalbán R; Piñero DP; Javaloy J; Alió JL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1925-33. PubMed ID: 22981614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Corneal topography and pachymetry in normal eyes].
Liu Z; Xie Y; Zhang M
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Mar; 37(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 11864407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraocular pressure in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population.
Fukuoka S; Aihara M; Iwase A; Araie M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 18039350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography.
Amano S; Honda N; Amano Y; Yamagami S; Miyai T; Samejima T; Ogata M; Miyata K
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jun; 113(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 16751036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. No forward shifting of posterior corneal surface in eyes undergoing LASIK.
Nishimura R; Negishi K; Saiki M; Arai H; Shimizu S; Toda I; Tsubota K
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1104-10. PubMed ID: 17239440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Corneal thickness association with ocular and corneal high-order aberrations.
Mohamed EM; Wojtowicz JC; Bowman W; Cavanagh HD; Mootha V; Verity S; McCulley JP
Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Nov; 35(6):297-301. PubMed ID: 19713859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.
Miháltz K; Kovács I; Takács A; Nagy ZZ
Cornea; 2009 Oct; 28(9):976-80. PubMed ID: 19724217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.
Barkana Y; Gerber Y; Elbaz U; Schwartz S; Ken-Dror G; Avni I; Zadok D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1729-35. PubMed ID: 16246776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thicknesses between normal subjects and patients with primary open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma].
Rüfer F; Westphal S; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Aug; 224(8):636-40. PubMed ID: 17717779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors influencing central corneal thickness in a Turkish population.
Altinok A; Sen E; Yazici A; Aksakal FN; Oncul H; Koklu G
Curr Eye Res; 2007 May; 32(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 17514526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
