These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15719730)

  • 1. [Optimization of endosurgical treatment of women with stress urine incontinence].
    Podoluzhnyĭ VI; Rybnikov SV; Artamonov VA; Chunarev VF
    Urologiia; 2004; (6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15719730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Laparoscopic transperitoneal colposuspension modo Burch in stress incontinence in women. A comparison of early and late results].
    Huk J; Fryczkowski M
    Przegl Lek; 2002; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12152257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?].
    Pfitzenmaier J; Gilfrich C; Faldum A; Müller M; Hohenfellner M; Thüroff JW
    Aktuelle Urol; 2003 May; 34(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 14566688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study].
    Tong JL; Zhu L; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(45):3192-4. PubMed ID: 19171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic morphological changes in the anterior vaginal wall before and after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in primary urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
    Albo M; Wruck L; Baker J; Brubaker L; Chai T; Dandreo KJ; Diokno A; Goode P; Kraus S; Kusek JW; Lemack G; Lowder J; Steers W;
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1810-4. PubMed ID: 17437826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
    Jenkins TR; Liu CY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17625411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
    Reid F; Smith AR
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
    Carey MP; Goh JT; Rosamilia A; Cornish A; Gordon I; Hawthorne G; Maher CF; Dwyer PL; Moran P; Gilmour DT
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five years follow up of laparoscopic burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in Thai women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Wisawasukmongchol W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88(9):1182-6. PubMed ID: 16536102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Burch colposuspension].
    Almeida M; Colaço J; Santos Pereira H; Vieira A; Gonçalves V; Retto H; Meirinho M
    Acta Med Port; 2004; 17(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15636723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Modified sacrocolpopexy combined with a Burch procedure for recurrent stress urinary incontinence].
    Seif C; Hamann M; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
    Aktuelle Urol; 2006 May; 37(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 16733823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic burch colposuspension: comparison of effectiveness of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal techniques.
    Bulent Tiras M; Sendag F; Dilek U; Guner H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Sep; 116(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15294373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension.
    Cayan F; Dilek S; Akbay E; Cayan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 277(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17653739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic single-port Burch colposuspension with an extraperitoneal approach and standard instruments for stress urinary incontinence: early results from a series of 15 patients.
    Gumus II; Surgit O; Kaygusuz I
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2013 Apr; 22(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 22909022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One year follow-up on the SPARC sling system for the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Primus G
    Int J Urol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 17083393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional results after the suburethral sling procedure for urinary stress incontinence: a prospective randomized multicentre study comparing the retropubic and transobturator routes.
    Daraï E; Frobert JL; Grisard-Anaf M; Lienhart J; Fernandez H; Dubernard G; David-Montefiore E
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):795-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 17010507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: Laparoscopic versus colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence by Tan et al. Vol. 26(2) March 2007.
    Reid F
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(1):102; author reply 103. PubMed ID: 19089899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.