These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1572042)
1. Synchronized repolarization after defibrillation shocks. A possible component of the defibrillation process demonstrated by optical recordings in rabbit heart. Dillon SM Circulation; 1992 May; 85(5):1865-78. PubMed ID: 1572042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period. Dillon SM Circ Res; 1991 Sep; 69(3):842-56. PubMed ID: 1873877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shock-induced depolarization of refractory myocardium prevents wave-front propagation in defibrillation. Kwaku KF; Dillon SM Circ Res; 1996 Nov; 79(5):957-73. PubMed ID: 8888688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses. Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Animated images of cardiac membrane voltage during defibrillation. Pruente HM; Bove R; Kwaku KF; Dillon SM J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():7-15. PubMed ID: 8656132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of shock-induced changes in transmembrane potential on reentrant waves and outcome during cardioversion of isolated rabbit hearts. Evans FG; Ideker RE; Gray RA J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 13(11):1118-27. PubMed ID: 12475103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks. Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation. Tovar OH; Jones JL Am J Physiol; 1997 Feb; 272(2 Pt 2):H1011-9. PubMed ID: 9124409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can shocks timed to action potentials in low-gradient regions improve both internal and out-of-hospital defibrillation? Jones J; Noe W; Tovar O; Lin Y; Hsu W J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():41-4. PubMed ID: 9988004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Sweeney MB; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Clin Invest; 1986 Mar; 77(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 3949979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of defibrillation efficacy with preshock synchronized pacing. Pak HN; Okuyama Y; Oh YS; Hayashi H; Liu YB; Chen PS; Lin SF J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 15(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 15149429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of atrial defibrillation shocks on the ventricles in isolated sheep hearts. Gray RA; Jalife J Circulation; 1998 Apr; 97(16):1613-22. PubMed ID: 9593567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]