These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1572138)

  • 1. Modification of the error-rate bounded classification scheme for use with two MIC break points.
    Brunden MN; Zurenko GE; Kapik B
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Feb; 15(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 1572138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical laboratory approach to evaluate administration dose of arbekacin. Reevaluation of in vitro MIC break points in the disk susceptibility test].
    Matsuo K; Uete T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1994 Aug; 47(8):1041-52. PubMed ID: 7933533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical laboratory approach in estimating effective administrative dose of piperacillin. Reevaluation of MIC break points in 3 and 4 category systems of disc susceptibility test].
    Matsuo K; Uete T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1990 Sep; 43(9):1559-71. PubMed ID: 2262963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The correlation between the MICs deduced from Showa disk method and the MICs determined by micro-dilution method].
    Moroizumi S; Kasitani F; Isikawa M; Iwata M; Ohno A; Yamaguchi K
    Rinsho Byori; 1994 Oct; 42(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 7996716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [In vitro MIC break point for appropriate clinical use of antibiotic].
    Uete T; Matsuo K
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1993 Mar; 46(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 8510318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods.
    Galani I; Kontopidou F; Souli M; Rekatsina PD; Koratzanis E; Deliolanis J; Giamarellou H
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 May; 31(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 18328674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical laboratory approach for estimating the effective administrative dose of latamoxef. Significance of a 4-category system interpretation of the latamoxef disc susceptibility test].
    Uete T; Matsuo K
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1987 Nov; 40(11):1906-16. PubMed ID: 3327966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of susceptibility testing of ceftriaxone.
    Squires E; Cleeland R; Christenson J; Boehni E
    Am J Med; 1984 Oct; 77(4C):12-6. PubMed ID: 6093512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro susceptibility test of sitafloxacin against resistant gram-negative bacilli isolated from Thai patients by disk diffusion method.
    Thamlikitkul V; Tiengrim S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Mar; 97 Suppl 3():S7-12. PubMed ID: 24772575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical laboratory approach for estimating effective administrative dose of cefoperazone. Evaluation of disc susceptibility test and its interpretation system].
    Matsuo K; Uete T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1988 Oct; 41(10):1418-29. PubMed ID: 3204655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical laboratory approach for estimating effective administrative dosage of cefmenoxime. Observation on the MICS and cefmenoxime disc susceptibility test].
    Uete T; Matsuo K
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1984 May; 37(5):791-801. PubMed ID: 6090721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical laboratory approach to estimating the effective administration dose of imipenem/cilastatin. Evaluation of the disk susceptibility test and its interpretation system].
    Matsuo K; Uete T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1989 Nov; 42(11):2377-92. PubMed ID: 2621780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of 30/20-Microgram Disk Content versus MIC Results for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Sader HS; Rhomberg PR; Huband MD; Critchley IA; Stone GG; Flamm RK; Jones RN
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jun; 56(6):. PubMed ID: 29563198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aztreonam: correlation between disk diffusion and agar plate dilutions susceptibility tests.
    Toma EC; Morisset R; Phaneuf D; Poisson M
    Chemotherapy; 1985; 31(6):451-5. PubMed ID: 4075858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical laboratory approach for estimating effective administrative dose of tobramycin. Reevaluation of in vitro MIC break points of disk susceptibility test].
    Uete G; Matsuo K; Uete T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1989 Sep; 42(9):1888-99. PubMed ID: 2810752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of proposed criteria of disk susceptibility testing for tosufloxacin and lomefloxacin in NCCLS guidelines and WHO standards].
    Aihara M; Oguri T; Kanno H; Kubo S; Honda M; Satoh K; Daimon Y; Yamanaka K; Sugawara K; Furuta T
    Rinsho Byori; 1992 Jan; 40(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 1312183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates: comparative evaluation of disk-diffusion and E-test methods.
    Mishra KK; Srivastava S; Garg A; Ayyagari A
    Curr Microbiol; 2006 Oct; 53(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 16972131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Kingella kingae with broth microdilution and disk diffusion using EUCAST recommended media.
    Matuschek E; Åhman J; Kahlmeter G; Yagupsky P
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Apr; 24(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 28760709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical laboratory approach to evaluate efficacy of amikacin. Reevaluation of in vitro MIC break points in disc susceptibility test].
    Uete G; Matsuo K; Uete T
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1992 May; 45(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 1512934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical laboratory approach for estimating effective administrative dose of sulbactam/cefoperazone].
    Uete T; Matsuo K
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1988 Nov; 41(11):1578-90. PubMed ID: 3210296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.