These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15721396)

  • 1. An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: the 'STARD' checklist.
    Selman TJ; Khan KS; Mann CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):575-8. PubMed ID: 15721396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
    Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for reporting information in studies of diagnostic test accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Dec; 81(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 14638443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consensus-based reporting standards for diagnostic test accuracy studies for paratuberculosis in ruminants.
    Gardner IA; Nielsen SS; Whittington RJ; Collins MT; Bakker D; Harris B; Sreevatsan S; Lombard JE; Sweeney R; Smith DR; Gavalchin J; Eda S
    Prev Vet Med; 2011 Aug; 101(1-2):18-34. PubMed ID: 21601933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
    Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The evaluation of diagnostic tests].
    Carnero-Pardo C
    Rev Neurol; 2005 Jun 1-15; 40(11):641-3. PubMed ID: 15948063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.
    Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 18778913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. General radiologists' diagnostic accuracy: incomplete presentation of data casts doubt on study's conclusions.
    Zivian MT; Gershater R; Erly WK; Ashdown BC; Lucio RW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):697-9. PubMed ID: 15671405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 14760036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Aug; 58(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 12887949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
    Bailey B; Amre DK
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A philosophical perspective supports the need for patient-outcome studies in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Sonke GS; Verbeek AL; Kiemeney LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18619792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials.
    Ferrante di Ruffano L; Hyde CJ; McCaffery KJ; Bossuyt PM; Deeks JJ
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e686. PubMed ID: 22354600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].
    Salech F; Mery V; Larrondo F; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 19030668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Knowing how to read a scientific article. 4. Knowing how to apply a diagnostic test].
    Coggiola M; Bobbio M; Bongioanni S; Demichelis B; Longo M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 25(9):1211-22. PubMed ID: 8529859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based obstetric and gynaecologic diagnosis: the STARD checklist for authors, peer-reviewers and readers of test accuracy studies.
    Khan KS; Bakour SH; Bossuyt PM
    BJOG; 2004 Jul; 111(7):638-40. PubMed ID: 15198751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 5 Evaluation of a diagnostic test.
    Goodacre S
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jan; 26(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 19104103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.