490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15721556)
1. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users.
Roman S; Canévet G; Marquis P; Triglia JM; Liégeois-Chauvel C
Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Rahne T; Plontke SK; Wagner L
Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mismatch negativity brain response as an index of speech perception recovery in cochlear-implant recipients.
Lonka E; Kujala T; Lehtokoski A; Johansson R; Rimmanen S; Alho K; Näätänen R
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 15084820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech versus tone processing in compensated dyslexia: discrimination and lateralization with a dichotic mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm.
Sebastian C; Yasin I
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 18801392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory cortical responses in patients with cochlear implants.
Burdo S; Razza S; Di Berardino F; Tognola G
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2006 Apr; 26(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 16886849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attenuated auditory event-related potential (mismatch negativity) in children with developmental dysphasia.
Holopainen IE; Korpilahti P; Juottonen K; Lang H; Sillanpää M
Neuropediatrics; 1997 Oct; 28(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 9413003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background.
Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
