These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15721560)

  • 1. Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.
    Williams EJ; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):44-54. PubMed ID: 15721560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correspondence between behavioral and individually "optimized" otoacoustic emission estimates of human cochlear input/output curves.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3602-13. PubMed ID: 20550260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.
    Yasin I; Plack CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 6(4):368-77. PubMed ID: 16261268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efferent-induced change in human cochlear compression and its influence on masking of tones.
    Bhagat SP; Carter PH
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 20813158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of masker component phase on the forward masking produced by complex tones in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Tarasewicz E
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15157967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling DPOAE input/output function compression: comparisons with hearing thresholds.
    Bhagat SP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Sep; 25(8):746-59. PubMed ID: 25380121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear compression in listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Plack CJ; Meddis R; Blanco JL
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):172-83. PubMed ID: 15953526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.
    Long GR; Talmadge CL; Lee J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1613-26. PubMed ID: 19045653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A variant temporal-masking-curve method for inferring peripheral auditory compression.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Alves-Pinto A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1544-54. PubMed ID: 18345842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.
    Pérez-González P; Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 25534365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.
    Rodríguez J; Neely ST; Jesteadt W; Tan H; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):864-75. PubMed ID: 21361444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitization to masked tones following notched-noise correlates with estimates of cochlear function using distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhou X; Henin S; Thompson SE; Long GR; Parra LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):970-6. PubMed ID: 20136219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
    Abel C; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On- and off-frequency compression estimated using a new version of the additivity of forward masking technique.
    Plack CJ; Arifianto D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):771-86. PubMed ID: 20707447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.