260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15721649)
1. A resampling approach for adjustment in prediction models for covariate measurement error.
Li W; Mazumdar S; Arena VC; Sussman N
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Mar; 77(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 15721649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement error.
Bartlett JW; De Stavola BL; Frost C
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3158-78. PubMed ID: 19777493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
Hossain S; Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.
Freedman LS; Fainberg V; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Carroll RJ
Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 15032787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Copula based prediction models: an application to an aortic regurgitation study.
Kumar P; Shoukri MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():21. PubMed ID: 17573974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
Chatburn RL
AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
Fung KY; Krewski D
J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating and testing interactions in linear regression models when explanatory variables are subject to classical measurement error.
Murad H; Freedman LS
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17340676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correction for covariate measurement error in generalized linear models--a bootstrap approach.
Haukka JK
Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1127-32. PubMed ID: 7548695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A longitudinal measurement error model with a semicontinuous covariate.
Li L; Shao J; Palta M
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):824-30. PubMed ID: 16135034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural inference in transition measurement error models for longitudinal data.
Pan W; Lin X; Zeng D
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):402-12. PubMed ID: 16918904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
Bartley DL
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias due to aggregation of individual covariates in the Cox regression model.
Abrahamowicz M; Du Berger R; Krewski D; Burnett R; Bartlett G; Tamblyn RM; Leffondré K
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 160(7):696-706. PubMed ID: 15383414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of ethylene content in melt-state random and block polypropylene by near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics: comparison of a new calibration transfer method with a slope/bias correction method.
Watari M; Ozaki Y
Appl Spectrosc; 2004 Oct; 58(10):1210-8. PubMed ID: 18070400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: bias and efficiency.
Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):633-52. PubMed ID: 15917376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced-rank proportional hazards regression and simulation-based prediction for multi-state models.
Fiocco M; Putter H; van Houwelingen HC
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4340-58. PubMed ID: 18425994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple digital image processing system to aid in melanoma diagnosis in an everyday melanocytic skin lesion unit: a preliminary report.
Manousaki AG; Manios AG; Tsompanaki EI; Panayiotides JG; Tsiftsis DD; Kostaki AK; Tosca AD
Int J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16650167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the calibration process of film dosimetry: OLS inverse regression versus WLS inverse prediction.
Crop F; Van Rompaye B; Paelinck L; Vakaet L; Thierens H; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(14):3971-84. PubMed ID: 18596368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement error in covariates in the marginal hazards model for multivariate failure time data.
Greene WF; Cai J
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):987-96. PubMed ID: 15606419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimation of uncertainties of DTI parameters.
Chung S; Lu Y; Henry RG
Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 16938472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
