These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15721707)

  • 1. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.
    Liu J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 15721707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry.
    Hamilton KE; Pye DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 18521022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.
    del Buey MA; Cristóbal JA; Ascaso FJ; Lavilla L; Lanchares E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3199-202. PubMed ID: 19255149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician?
    Kotecha A
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 17998034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
    Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
    Luan CS; Chen XM; Deng YP; Wang L; Liu DJ; Cui M; Li J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Palladino A; Di Gregorio MG; Politano L
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 19019447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New ways to measure intraocular pressure.
    ElMallah MK; Asrani SG
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18301285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure.
    Kwon TH; Ghaboussi J; Pecknold DA; Hashash YM
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(8):1707-13. PubMed ID: 18455173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diurnal variation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry estimates of intraocular pressure.
    Hamilton KE; Pye DC; Aggarwala S; Evian S; Khosla J; Perera R
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17224746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.
    Luce DA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 15721708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of riboflavin-UVA-induced collagen cross-linking on intraocular pressure measurement.
    Romppainen T; Bachmann LM; Kaufmann C; Kniestedt C; Mrochen M; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5494-8. PubMed ID: 18055797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 19835329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.