These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study. Kirmse U; Jacobsen T; Schröger E Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 19345610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Munka L; Berti S Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human EEG very high frequency oscillations reflect the number of matches with a template in auditory short-term memory. Lenz D; Jeschke M; Schadow J; Naue N; Ohl FW; Herrmann CS Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():81-92. PubMed ID: 18036577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Common coding of auditory and visual spatial information in working memory. Lehnert G; Zimmer HD Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():158-67. PubMed ID: 18652807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones. Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention. Melara RD; Rao A; Tong Y J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):279-306. PubMed ID: 11999855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1. Campbell T; Winkler I; Kujala T Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):530-40. PubMed ID: 17532805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of prefrontal cortex for selective attention in a visual working memory task. Schreppel TJ; Pauli P; Ellgring H; Fallgatter AJ; Herrmann MJ Int J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 118(12):1673-88. PubMed ID: 18937114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial correspondence between functional MRI (fMRI) activations and cortical current density maps of event-related potentials (ERP): a study with four tasks. Minati L; Rosazza C; Zucca I; D'Incerti L; Scaioli V; Bruzzone MG Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):112-27. PubMed ID: 18758934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical generators of slow evoked responses elicited by spatial and nonspatial auditory working memory tasks. Anurova I; Artchakov D; Korvenoja A; Ilmoniemi RJ; Aronen HJ; Carlson S Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1644-54. PubMed ID: 15897006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation. Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatiotemporal analysis of auditory "what" and "where" working memory. Alain C; McDonald KL; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR Cereb Cortex; 2009 Feb; 19(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 18534993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task. Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]