BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15723753)

  • 1. Nutritional assessment of raw and germinated pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein and carbohydrate by in vitro and in vivo techniques.
    Urbano G; López-Jurado M; Frejnagel S; Gómez-Villalva E; Porres JM; Frías J; Vidal-Valverde C; Aranda P
    Nutrition; 2005 Feb; 21(2):230-9. PubMed ID: 15723753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nutritional assessment in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (Pisum sativum L.).
    Alonso R; Grant G; Dewey P; Marzo F
    J Agric Food Chem; 2000 Jun; 48(6):2286-90. PubMed ID: 10888538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impacts of short-term germination on the chemical compositions, technological characteristics and nutritional quality of yellow pea and faba bean flours.
    Setia R; Dai Z; Nickerson MT; Sopiwnyk E; Malcolmson L; Ai Y
    Food Res Int; 2019 Aug; 122():263-272. PubMed ID: 31229080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro digestibility, protein composition and techno-functional properties of Saskatchewan grown yellow field peas (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by processing.
    Ma Z; Boye JI; Hu X
    Food Res Int; 2017 Feb; 92():64-78. PubMed ID: 28290299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of germination on the carbohydrate composition of the dietary fiber of peas (Pisum sativum L.).
    Martín-Cabrejas MA; Ariza N; Esteban R; Mollá E; Waldron K; López-Andréu FJ
    J Agric Food Chem; 2003 Feb; 51(5):1254-9. PubMed ID: 12590464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of in vitro antioxidant activity, bioactive components, and nutrient digestibility in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) as influenced by germination time and temperature.
    Sharma S; Singh A; Singh B
    J Food Biochem; 2019 Feb; 43(2):e12706. PubMed ID: 31353645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nutritional evaluation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein diets after mild hydrothermal treatment and with and without added phytase.
    Urbano G; Aranda P; Gómez-Villalva E; Frejnagel S; Porres JM; Frías J; Vidal-Valverde C; López-Jurado M
    J Agric Food Chem; 2003 Apr; 51(8):2415-20. PubMed ID: 12670190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antinutrients and digestibility (in vitro) of soaked, dehulled and germinated cowpeas.
    Preet K; Punia D
    Nutr Health; 2000; 14(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 10904935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nutritional evaluation of ethanol-extracted lentil flours.
    Sanz MA; Blázquez I; Sierra I; Medrano MA; Frias J; Vidal-Valverde C; Hernández A
    J Agric Food Chem; 2001 Apr; 49(4):1854-60. PubMed ID: 11308336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of peas for broiler chickens.
    Hejdysz M; Kaczmarek SA; Rutkowski A
    Arch Anim Nutr; 2016 Oct; 70(5):364-77. PubMed ID: 27434309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nutritional evaluation of chickpea and germinated chickpea flours.
    Fernandez ML; Berry JW
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1988; 38(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 3200798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of germination on the chemical composition, thermal, pasting, and moisture sorption properties of flours from chickpea, lentil, and yellow pea.
    Xu M; Jin Z; Simsek S; Hall C; Rao J; Chen B
    Food Chem; 2019 Oct; 295():579-587. PubMed ID: 31174798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Germination and Fermentation on Carbohydrate Composition of Australian Sweet Lupin and Soybean Seeds and Flours.
    Kaczmarska KT; Chandra-Hioe MV; Zabaras D; Frank D; Arcot J
    J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Nov; 65(46):10064-10073. PubMed ID: 29058428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dehulling and germination on the functional properties of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) flour.
    Lakshmipathy K; Buvaneswaran M; Rawson A; Chidanand DV
    Food Chem; 2024 Aug; 449():139265. PubMed ID: 38604036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo (rat assay) assessment of nutritional improvement of peas (Pisum sativum L.).
    Nagra SA; Bhatty N
    East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(3):646-53. PubMed ID: 17687838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biological and chemical evaluation of chick pea seed proteins as affected by germination, extraction and alpha-amylase treatment.
    Mansour EH
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1996 Jun; 49(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 8983053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Composition and in vitro digestibility of raw versus cooked white- and colour-flowered peas.
    Pastuszewska B; Vitjazkova M; Swiech E; Taciak M
    Nahrung; 2004 Jun; 48(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15285116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functionality and starch digestibility of wrinkled and round pea flours of two different particle sizes.
    Ren Y; Setia R; Warkentin TD; Ai Y
    Food Chem; 2021 Jan; 336():127711. PubMed ID: 32777656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between proportion and composition of albumins, and in vitro protein digestibility of raw and cooked pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.).
    Park SJ; Kim TW; Baik BK
    J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Aug; 90(10):1719-25. PubMed ID: 20564440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination by capillary electrophoresis of total and available niacin in different development stage of raw and processed legumes: comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Vidal-Valverde C; Sierra I; Díaz-Pollán C; Blázquez I
    Electrophoresis; 2001 May; 22(8):1479-83. PubMed ID: 11386659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.