These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15724512)

  • 21. [Scheffé-type paired comparison models for examining correlations between individual preferences for alternatives].
    Iwama N; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2011 Dec; 82(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 22319952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mediation from multilevel to structural equation modeling.
    MacKinnon DP; Valente MJ
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2014; 65(2-3):198-204. PubMed ID: 25413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling.
    Schreiber JB
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Jun; 4(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 18555963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of alternative regression models for paired binary data.
    Glynn RJ; Rosner B
    Stat Med; 1994 May; 13(10):1023-36. PubMed ID: 8073198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.
    Preacher KJ; Zyphur MJ; Zhang Z
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):209-33. PubMed ID: 20822249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical inference and experimental design of univariate qualitative data of paired design.
    Hu LP; Bao XL; Tao LX
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Jan; 9(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 21227042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical inference and experimental design of univariate quantitative data of paired design for univariate quantitative data.
    Hu LP; Bao XL; Wang Q
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 8(12):1195-8. PubMed ID: 21144464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression in the optimization of formulation parameters of leuprolide acetate loaded liposomes.
    Arulsudar N; Subramanian N; Muthy RS
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2005 Aug; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 16124936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of clustered matched-pair data.
    Durkalski VL; Palesch YY; Lipsitz SR; Rust PF
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2417-28. PubMed ID: 12872299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A matched crossover design for clinical trials.
    Simon LJ; Chinchilli VM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Sep; 28(5):638-46. PubMed ID: 17383239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. GW-SEM: A Statistical Package to Conduct Genome-Wide Structural Equation Modeling.
    Verhulst B; Maes HH; Neale MC
    Behav Genet; 2017 May; 47(3):345-359. PubMed ID: 28299468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sediment transport modeling in deposited bed sewers: unified form of May's equations using the particle swarm optimization algorithm.
    Safari MJS; Shirzad A; Mohammadi M
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 76(3-4):992-1000. PubMed ID: 28799945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Image Evaluation with Paired Comparison Method Using Automatic Analysis Software: Comparison of CT Images with Simulated Levels of Exposure Dose].
    Shiraishi J; Okazaki Y; Goto M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 30662030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale.
    Klar N; Donner A
    Stat Med; 1997 Aug; 16(15):1753-64. PubMed ID: 9265698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
    Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of an assistive technology product design using a paired comparisons method within a mixed methods approach: a case study evaluating preferences for four types of cutlery with 34 upper limb impaired participants.
    Torrens GE; Smith NC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Jul; 8(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 23150936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Virtual Levels and Role Models: N-Level Structural Equations Model of Reciprocal Ratings Data.
    Mehta PD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):315-334. PubMed ID: 29558166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach.
    Cheung MW; Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Mar; 10(1):40-64. PubMed ID: 15810868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Item Response Modeling of Paired Comparison and Ranking Data.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Brown A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Nov; 45(6):935-74. PubMed ID: 26760724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.