These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15725201)

  • 1. Syrian women's preferences for birth attendant and birth place.
    Bashour H; Abdulsalam A
    Birth; 2005 Mar; 32(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 15725201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].
    Takács L; Seidlerová JM; Smolík F; Hoskovcová S; Antonín P; Vařáková J; Valová A; Svoboda T; Dočkalová J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Dec; 80(6):426-35. PubMed ID: 26741157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eliciting preferences for key attributes of intrapartum care in the Netherlands.
    van Haaren-ten Haken T; Pavlova M; Hendrix M; Nieuwenhuijze M; de Vries R; Nijhuis J
    Birth; 2014 Jun; 41(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 24702440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's choice of maternal healthcare in Parung, West Java, Indonesia: Midwife versus traditional birth attendant.
    Agus Y; Horiuchi S; Iida M
    Women Birth; 2018 Dec; 31(6):513-519. PubMed ID: 29454665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferred place of birth: characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands.
    van Haaren-Ten Haken T; Hendrix M; Nieuwenhuijze M; Budé L; de Vries R; Nijhuis J
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 22921160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's preferences and knowledge about the legal competences of midwives in Brussels, Belgium. A descriptive observational study.
    Vermeulen J; Swinnen E; D'haenens F; Buyl R; Beeckman K
    Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():177-86. PubMed ID: 27450589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women's expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey.
    Gamble J; Creedy DK; Teakle B
    Women Birth; 2007 Sep; 20(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 17597016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The limitations on choice: Palestinian women's childbirth location, dissatisfaction with the place of birth and determinants.
    Giacaman R; Abu-Rmeileh NM; Wick L
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Feb; 17(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 16798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why?
    Angeja AC; Washington AE; Vargas JE; Gomez R; Rojas I; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 17014679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interventions during labor and birth in the United States: a qualitative analysis of women's experiences.
    Bibeau AM
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2014 Dec; 5(4):167-73. PubMed ID: 25433825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women's perspective of maternity care in Cambodia.
    Ith P; Dawson A; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2013 Mar; 26(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22722014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Attitude of pregnant women towards labour--study of forms of preparation and preferences].
    Kosińska K; Krychowska A; Wielgoś M; Myszewska A; Przyboś A
    Ginekol Pol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):973-9. PubMed ID: 16566377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antenatal survey of women's birthing choices in Qatar.
    Mohan S; Ghani R; Lindow S; Farrell T
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Jul; 48(6):589-599. PubMed ID: 32619195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review.
    Hadjigeorgiou E; Kouta C; Papastavrou E; Papadopoulos I; Mårtensson LB
    Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):380-90. PubMed ID: 21683487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between women-centred care and women's birth experiences: a comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan.
    Iida M; Horiuchi S; Porter SE
    Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 21835515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing the fulfillment of women's preferences for birthing positions during second stage of labor.
    Nieuwenhuijze M; de Jonge A; Korstjens I; Lagro-Jansse T
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Mar; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 22211960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of health insurance and socioeconomic status on women's choice in birth attendant and place of delivery across regions in Indonesia: a multinomial logit analysis.
    Lee JT; McPake B; Putri LP; Anindya K; Puspandari DA; Marthias T
    BMJ Glob Health; 2023 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36650018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 'Not enough people to look after you': an exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland.
    Larkin P; Begley CM; Devane D
    Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21237541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Models of intrapartum care and women's trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed-methods study.
    Pitchforth E; Watson V; Tucker J; Ryan M; van Teijlingen E; Farmer J; Ireland J; Thomson E; Kiger A; Bryers H
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 17903223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.