114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15725862)
1. The Bethesda System 2001: update on terminology and application.
Crothers BA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 48(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15725862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference.
Moriarty AT; Wilbur D
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytologic diagnosis of squamous dysplasia and carcinoma of the cervix.
Gondos B; Townsend DE; Ostergard DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1971 May; 110(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 5573598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Is Bethesda system better than Pap classification?].
Vuopala S
Duodecim; 1999; 115(18):2030-4. PubMed ID: 11941821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pap, Bethesda or something else?].
Syrjänen K
Duodecim; 2000; 116(11):1248-50. PubMed ID: 11989011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Back to the negative Pap test: behind the scenes at Bethesda 2001.
Young NA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Apr; 26(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 11933263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: using a quality control approach to define an 'adequately cellular' liquid-based cervical cytology specimen.
Evered A
Cytopathology; 2007 Oct; 18(5):325-6; author reply 326. PubMed ID: 17883693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflections on adequacy in cervical/vaginal cytology.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):103-4. PubMed ID: 10385439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How should adequacy of liquid-based cytology be defined?
Desai M; Herbert A
Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 16879262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions: cytodiagnostic criteria and pitfalls.
Nguyen GK; Nguyen-Ho P; Husain M; Husain EM
Anat Pathol; 1996; 1():139-64. PubMed ID: 9390926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [How to read a PAP report?].
Nieminen P
Duodecim; 1998; 114(11):1138-43. PubMed ID: 11544696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.
Solomon D; Davey D; Kurman R; Moriarty A; O'Connor D; Prey M; Raab S; Sherman M; Wilbur D; Wright T; Young N; ;
JAMA; 2002 Apr; 287(16):2114-9. PubMed ID: 11966386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The promise and risk of a new technology: The Lehigh Valley Hospital's experience with liquid-based cervical cytology.
Dupree WB; Suprun HZ; Beckwith DG; Shane JJ; Lucente V
Cancer; 1998 Aug; 84(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 9723594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Continued lack of appreciation for the significance of the Bethesda system--Proceedings from cytology courses organized in Wrocław].
Pawelec M
Ginekol Pol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 11455937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. European guidelines on cervical screening.
Smith JH; Desai MS
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The official nomenclature and terminologies in diagnostic cytopathology: history, evolution, applicability and future.
Ali SZ; Leteurtre E
Ann Pathol; 2012 Dec; 32(6):e3-7, 389-93. PubMed ID: 23244483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop.
JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(7):931-4. PubMed ID: 2754794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. Developed and approved at a National Cancer Institute Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A., December 12-13, 1988.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1989 Oct; 11(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 2803441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix as the primary cytological diagnosis.
CAMPOS J
Acta Cytol; 1962; 6():155-7. PubMed ID: 13876105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Observations on the use of colpocytology in the diagnosis of uterine cervical neoplasms].
França LC; Velloni M; de Lemos S
Matern Infanc (Sao Paulo); 1965; 24(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 5840316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
