BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15726352)

  • 1. Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? For.
    Ide M; Suzuki Y
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Mar; 32(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 15726352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? Against.
    Weckesser M; Schober O
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Mar; 32(3):342-3. PubMed ID: 15726351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A plea for the elective inclusion of the brain in routine whole-body FDG PET.
    Belhocine T; Weiner SM; Brink I; De Deyn PP; Roland J; Van der Borght T; Flamen P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Mar; 32(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 15692807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 18F-FDG PET as a candidate for "qualified biomarker": functional assessment of treatment response in oncology.
    Larson SM; Schwartz LH
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Jun; 47(6):901-3. PubMed ID: 16741296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source of impaired image quality in 3D whole-body FDG PET scanning.
    Paans AM; Boerdijk SM; Willemsen AT; Pruim J
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Aug; 31(8):1207; author reply 1208. PubMed ID: 15197498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-individual variability of cardiac uptake on serial whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
    Khandani AH; Isasi CR; Donald Blaufox M
    Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Sep; 26(9):787-91. PubMed ID: 16096582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 18F-FDG imaging: pitfalls and artifacts.
    Abouzied MM; Crawford ES; Nabi HA
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Sep; 33(3):145-55; quiz 162-3. PubMed ID: 16145222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting residual fluorine 18 from a medical PET-CT procedure during population whole body counter screening in Fukushima.
    Nishikawa Y; Tsubokura M; Kato S; Ishii T; Saito Y
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2014 Dec; 8(6):469-70. PubMed ID: 25859688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of FDG PET in the management of lymphoma: practical guidelines.
    Kirby AM; George Mikhaeel N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2007 May; 28(5):355-7. PubMed ID: 17414884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early clinical experience and impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
    Akpinar AT
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Apr; 27(4):405. PubMed ID: 16531929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PET and cancer screening.
    Yasuda S; Ide M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2005 May; 19(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 15981668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer screening of healthy volunteers using whole-body 18F-FDG-PET scans: The Nishidai clinic study.
    Kojima S; Zhou B; Teramukai S; Hara A; Kosaka N; Matsuo Y; Suzuki H; Torigoe S; Suzuki T; Uno K; Fukushima M
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Aug; 43(12):1842-8. PubMed ID: 17614273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PET evaluation of lung cancer.
    Bunyaviroch T; Coleman RE
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):451-69. PubMed ID: 16513615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-FDG. PET Working Group. Procedures Committee of the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine].
    García Garzón JR; Rodríguez A; Cabrera A
    Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2009; 28(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 19406058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [18F-FDG whole-body positron-emission tomography (PET) in patients with unknown primary tumors].
    Matheja P; Schober O
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2000 Mar; 176(3):151-2. PubMed ID: 10742838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PET: too much of a good thing? Does the plethora of choices impact on patient management?
    Divgi C; Pandit-Taskar N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Apr; 32(4):398. PubMed ID: 15761778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positron emission tomography and bone metastases.
    Fogelman I; Cook G; Israel O; Van der Wall H
    Semin Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 35(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 15765376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined FDG and [F-18]fluoride whole-body PET: a feasible two-in-one approach to cancer imaging?
    Hoegerle S; Juengling F; Otte A; Altehoefer C; Moser EA; Nitzsche EU
    Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 9769840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer screening with whole-body PET/CT for healthy asymptomatic people in Japan: re-evaluation of its test validity and radiation exposure.
    Ghotbi N; Iwanaga M; Ohtsuru A; Ogawa Y; Yamashita S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 17477780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is it time to incorporate quantitative functional imaging data, FDG PET in particular, into the response evaluation criteria in solid tumours?
    Basu S; Nair N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2006 May; 27(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 16609351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.