These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15727322)

  • 21. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study.
    Lund DI; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 9457025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
    Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Features and treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with severe lateral mandibular shift and asymmetric vertical dimension.
    Kondo E
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 15615138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis.
    Cevidanes LH; Franco AA; Scanavini MA; Vigorito JW; Enlow DH; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 12695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric evaluation of the cervical spine posture following fixed functional therapy with Forsus™ appliance.
    Malik N; Fernandes BA; Ramamurthy PH; Anjum S; Prakash A; Sinha A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 35439888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.
    Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment.
    Nelson C; Harkness M; Herbison P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 8338068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth.
    Solow B; Siersbaek-Nielsen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):449-58. PubMed ID: 1590294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of cervical posture following palatal expansion: a 12-month follow-up controlled study.
    Tecco S; Caputi S; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16957058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical vertebral column morphology related to craniofacial morphology and head posture in preorthodontic children with Class II malocclusion and horizontal maxillary overjet.
    Arntsen T; Sonnesen L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 21724066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical headgear effects on the morphology of the cervical vertebrae and cervical posture.
    Yavuz I; Uzun B; Baydaş B; Ceylan I
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 17319762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the head and cervical posture between the self-balanced position and the Frankfurt method.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Jara X; Castillo N; Alfonso L; Schilling A; Valenzuela E; Frugone R; Magee D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Mar; 33(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 16512885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel' s functional regulator (1b).
    Alió-Sanz JJ; Iglesias-Conde C; Lorenzo-Pernía J; Iglesias-Linares A; Mendoza-Mendoza A; Solano-Reina E
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e689-96. PubMed ID: 22322486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.