These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15728593)

  • 1. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.
    Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Scharitzer M; Prokop M; Weber M; Fuchsjäger M; Oschatz E; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 15601893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
    Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
    Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography.
    Sung YM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Choe BK
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19304429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Hwang SA; Seo JB; Choi BK; Do KH; Ko SM; Lee SH; Lee JS; Song JW; Song KS; Lim TH
    Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 14530643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.
    Usami H; Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Fukushima H; Shimamoto K
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 16284772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
    Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
    Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.