165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15728593)
1. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.
Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.
Scharitzer M; Prokop M; Weber M; Fuchsjäger M; Oschatz E; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 15601893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography.
Sung YM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Choe BK
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19304429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.
Hwang SA; Seo JB; Choi BK; Do KH; Ko SM; Lee SH; Lee JS; Song JW; Song KS; Lim TH
Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 14530643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.
Usami H; Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Fukushima H; Shimamoto K
Eur Radiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 16284772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
