These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15731311)

  • 21. Efficiency of changing the embryo transfer time from day 3 to day 2 among women with poor ovarian response: a prospective randomized trial.
    Bahceci M; Ulug U; Ciray HN; Akman MA; Erden HF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 16716322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Laser assisted hatching: Rouen University Hospital outcomes].
    Blessmann-Roset J; Rives N; Clavier B; Milazzo JP; Mazurier S; Mousset-Siméon N; Macé B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Apr; 37(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 19346148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Implantation: physiology, pathology and therapeutic options in disorders of implantation].
    von Wolff M; Germeyer A; Strowitzki T
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 19346751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revealing the enigmas of implantation: what is the true impact of ovarian hyperstimulation?
    Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17678916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium on implantation and pregnancy rates after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers: a prospective randomized study.
    Urman B; Yakin K; Ata B; Isiklar A; Balaban B
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):604-12. PubMed ID: 17936283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does the timing of mock embryo transfer affect in vitro fertilization implantation and pregnancy rates?
    Katariya KO; Bates GW; Robinson RD; Arthur NJ; Propst AM
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Nov; 88(5):1462-4. PubMed ID: 17362942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Embryo transfer: a critical step in assisted reproduction].
    Kably A; Castelazo E; Vaca D; Barroso G
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2001 Mar; 69():118-21. PubMed ID: 11387880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer.
    Gleicher N; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1337-44. PubMed ID: 16495304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extended embryo culture reduces the implantation rate on day 4 and day 5 when only a maximum of three embryos are cultured beyond the pronuclear stage.
    Montag M; van der Ven K; Dorn C; van der Ven H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jan; 124(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 16188376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laser assisted hatching in good prognosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sagoskin AW; Levy MJ; Tucker MJ; Richter KS; Widra EA
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 17094975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Uterine anomalies and assisted reproductive techniques: preventing implantation failure?].
    Rongières C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):842-7. PubMed ID: 17766163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of assisted hatching on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective, randomized clinical trial and pregnancy follow-up.
    Ma S; Rowe T; Yuen BH
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Apr; 85(4):895-900. PubMed ID: 16580371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimizing the number of blastocyst stage embryos to transfer on day 5 or 6 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
    Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Racowsky C; Surrey ES;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 18222441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brown oocytes: implications for assisted reproductive technology.
    Esfandiari N; Burjaq H; Gotlieb L; Casper RF
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1522-5. PubMed ID: 16989830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Higher implantation rate using modified quarter laser-assisted zona thinning in repeated implantation failure.
    Debrock S; Spiessens C; Peeraer K; De Loecker P; Willemen D; D'Hooghe TM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 67(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 19005260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of fresh-cycle variables on the implantation potential of cryopreserved-thawed human embryos.
    Urman B; Balaban B; Yakin K
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17097088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Number of embryos transferred and implantation.
    Giannini P; Piscitelli C; Giallonardo A; Sbracia M; Morgia F; Torti M; Montigiani M; Schimberni M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Dec; 1034():278-83. PubMed ID: 15731319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Increasing success of assisted reproduction].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Jun; 5(207):1336. PubMed ID: 19626935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Implantation of the human embryo: clinical and epidemiological aspects.
    Delbaere I
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2008; 70(4):257-83. PubMed ID: 19166099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.