102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732183)
1. The fetal homicide fallacy: a comparison of California's inconsistent statutes to other states.
Converse HA
Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2003; 25(2):451-68. PubMed ID: 15732183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Unborn Victims of Violence Act.
Maher DP
Ethics Medics; 2004 Oct; 29(10):1-3. PubMed ID: 15834998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional considerations underlie Missouri's expansion of fetal rights within its wrongful death statute.
Brown ES
Miss Law Rev; 1996; 61(2):473-87. PubMed ID: 16086525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence.
Roden GJ
St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life.
Shah MK
Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abandonment and reconciliation: addressing political and common law objections to fetal homicide laws.
Curran DS
Duke Law J; 2009 Mar; 58(6):1107-42. PubMed ID: 19353836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. California's response for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus: Justus v. Atchison.
Dow PA
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1978; 3(2):589-608. PubMed ID: 11664965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion laws in the states.
Oliver L
NCSL Legisbrief; 2004 Oct; 12(38):1-2. PubMed ID: 15499709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wrongful death and the lost society of the unborn.
Meadows GA
J Leg Med; 1992 Mar; 13(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 1619354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 66 Federal Credit Union v. Tucker.
Mississippi. Supreme Court
Wests South Report; 2003; 853():104-22. PubMed ID: 16372438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability.
Ackmann EA
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
Trindel RM
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts.
Kim RH
Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An inside look at partial birth abortion.
Lowe LR
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Right to maintain action or to recover damages for death of unborn child.
Shapiro SR
Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 84():411-72. PubMed ID: 12091934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Causing a miscarriage--an act of murder?
Lloyd J
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Feb; 92(58):3. PubMed ID: 15586924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Compelled medical treatment of pregnant women: the balancing of maternal and fetal rights.
Harris P
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(1):133-61. PubMed ID: 15212015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
