These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732186)

  • 1. The doctrine of informed consent: to inform or not to inform?
    Walter P
    St Johns Law Rev; 1997 Sep; 71(3):543-90. PubMed ID: 15732186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York.
    Schreiber JA
    N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissing disclosure: just what the doctor ordered.
    Morris GH
    Ariz Law Rev; 2002; 44(2):313-71. PubMed ID: 15929239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two kinds of statistics, the kind you look up and the kind you make up: a critical analysis of comparative provider statistics and the doctrine of informed consent.
    Wolfberg J
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2002; 29(3):585-608. PubMed ID: 16482696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconceptualizing informed consent in an era of health care cost containment.
    Krause JH
    Iowa Law Rev; 1999 Oct; 85(1):261-386. PubMed ID: 12769114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent in Oklahoma: a search for reasonableness and predictability in the aftermath of Scott v. Bradford.
    Fisher ES
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 1996; 49(4):651-75. PubMed ID: 16437817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The second revolution in informed consent: comparing physicians to each other.
    Twerski AD; Cohen NB
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1999; 94(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 12455555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent law and the forgotten duty of physician inquiry.
    Gatter R
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):557-97. PubMed ID: 11962530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent and defenses to a lack of informed consent.
    Slovenko R
    J Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(3):441-70. PubMed ID: 15285074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The legal development of the informed consent doctrine: past and present.
    Dolgin JL
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010; 19(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 20025806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physician gag clauses--the hypocrisy of the Hippocratic Oath.
    Swanson DS
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1997; 21():313-34. PubMed ID: 16086489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient advocates or patient adversaries? Using fiduciary law to compel disclosure of managed care financial incentives.
    Johnston K
    San Diego Law Rev; 1998; 35(4):951-92. PubMed ID: 12778919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Averting malpractice by information: informed consent in the pediatric treatment environment.
    Popper A
    De Paul Law Rev; 1998; 47(4):819-36. PubMed ID: 11926230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin.
    Ketler SK
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practice makes perfect: experience-related information should fall within the purview of Pennsylvania's doctrine of informed consent.
    Rostolsky BM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2002; 40(3):543-60. PubMed ID: 15212018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Plumeri PA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1994 Jul; 4(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 8069471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Progress of the prudent patient: consent after Chester v Afshar.
    Wheat K
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Mar; 60(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 15710004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jury clears cancer center of failing to tell participants of clinical-trial risks.
    Blumenstyk G; Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2004 Apr; 50(33):A33. PubMed ID: 15287145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tort law--informed consent to medical treatment: a case of medical negligence.
    Gaughran N
    Dubl Univ Law J; 1997; (19):178-97. PubMed ID: 12449972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.