274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732545)
1. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Schelb E; Cavazos E; Troendle KB; Prihoda TJ
Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1784720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective clinical evaluation of electronically mixed polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: results from the prosthetic "SuperStudy"--a consumer evaluation.
Kugel G; Swift EJ; Sorensen JA; Tucker JH; Dunne JT
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (24):S3-21; quiz S22. PubMed ID: 11908410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional assessment of dental casts' occlusal surfaces using two impression materials.
Tarawneh FM; Panos PG; Athanasiou AE
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):821-6. PubMed ID: 18482343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biological evaluation of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Mazzanti G; Daniele C; Tita B; Vitali F; Signore A
Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 15766584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
