These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732651)

  • 1. Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?
    Culhane SE; Hosch HM; Weaver WG
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 15732651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
    Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
    McGowan MG; Myers B
    Violence Vict; 2004 Jun; 19(3):357-74. PubMed ID: 15631286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring Attitudes About Hate: Development of the Hate Crime Beliefs Scale.
    Cabeldue MK; Cramer RJ; Kehn A; Crosby JW; Anastasi JS
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(23):3656-3685. PubMed ID: 26951607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.
    Carter LM; Goodmon LB; Urs M; Rutledge-Jukes H
    J Homosex; 2023 May; 70(6):1187-1224. PubMed ID: 35171085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill.
    Terrance CA; Matheson K; Spanos NP
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):207-29. PubMed ID: 10810839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the Credibility of Child Sexual Assault Victims in Court: The Impact of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner.
    Golding JM; Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Lippert A; Magyarics CL
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):493-507. PubMed ID: 26294384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parole release decisions: impact of positive and negative victim and nonvictim input on a representative sample of parole-eligible inmates.
    Caplan JM
    Violence Vict; 2010; 25(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 20514818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.