These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732651)

  • 21. A Comparison of Juror Decision Making in Race-Based and Sexual Orientation-Based Hate Crime Cases.
    Gamblin BW; Kehn A; Vanderzanden K; Ruthig JC; Jones KM; Long BL
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Apr; 36(7-8):3231-3256. PubMed ID: 29766757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contextualizing restorative justice for hate crime.
    Gavrielides T
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Dec; 27(18):3624-43. PubMed ID: 22645026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Canadian mock juror attitudes and decisions in domestic violence cases involving asian and white interracial and intraracial couples.
    Maeder EM; Mossière A; Cheung L
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Mar; 28(4):667-84. PubMed ID: 22929345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Victim Responses to Violence: The Effect of Alcohol Context on Crime Labeling.
    Brennan I
    J Interpers Violence; 2016 Mar; 31(6):1116-40. PubMed ID: 25555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters.
    Semple JK; Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Aug; 109(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 22049670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statements from Youth in Legal Contexts: Effects of Consistency, Legal Role, and Age.
    Molinaro PF; Malloy LC
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):139-59. PubMed ID: 27021412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The perception of elder sexual abuse in the courtroom.
    Hodell EC; Golding JM; Yozwiak JA; Bradshaw GS; Kinstle TL; Marsil DF
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Jun; 15(6):678-98. PubMed ID: 19299250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
    Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors' decisions in a murder trial: probative or prejudicial?
    Douglas KS; Lyon DR; Ogloff JR
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):485-501. PubMed ID: 9374603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
    Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
    Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Violent crime and victim compensation: implications for social justice.
    Smith HP
    Violence Vict; 2006 Jun; 21(3):307-22. PubMed ID: 16761856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Jurors' views on the value and objectivity of mental health experts testifying in sexually violent predator trials.
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Turner DB
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 25043830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interpersonal violence and public policy: what about the victims?
    Kilpatrick DG
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 15152428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?
    Nitschke FT; McKimmie BM; Vanman EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 145(10):953-979. PubMed ID: 31282696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The addict as victim: producing the 'problem' of addiction in Australian victims of crime compensation laws.
    Seear K; Fraser S
    Int J Drug Policy; 2014 Sep; 25(5):826-35. PubMed ID: 24703423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The legal definition of hate crime and the hate offender's distorted cognitions.
    Sun K
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Jul; 27(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 16923731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.