These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732653)

  • 1. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory.
    Deffenbacher KA; Bornstein BH; Penrod SD; McGorty EK
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):687-706. PubMed ID: 15732653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of age-related changes in lineup performance.
    Humphries JE; Flowe HD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Apr; 132():189-204. PubMed ID: 25701225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The emotional eyewitness: the effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance.
    Houston KA; Clifford BR; Phillips LH; Memon A
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 22775133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are multiple-trial experiments appropriate for eyewitness identification studies? Accuracy, choosing, and confidence across trials.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Lindsay RCL
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2235-2254. PubMed ID: 28432569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: experimental control and real-world simulation.
    Clark SE; Tunnicliff JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 11480800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The aging eyewitness: effects of age on face, delay, and source-memory ability.
    Memon A; Bartlett J; Rose R; Gray C
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2003 Nov; 58(6):P338-45. PubMed ID: 14614118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sleep and eyewitness memory: Fewer false identifications after sleep when the target is absent from the lineup.
    Stepan ME; Dehnke TM; Fenn KM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0182907. PubMed ID: 28877169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification.
    Semmler C; Dunn J; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):400-415. PubMed ID: 29389161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification.
    Haw RM; Dickinson JJ; Meissner CA
    Memory; 2007 Jan; 15(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 17479929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.