These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15732691)

  • 1. Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Oct; 11(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 15732691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Sep; 32(6):965-78. PubMed ID: 15673184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?
    Logan GD; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):575-99. PubMed ID: 12848327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Still clever after all these years: searching for the homunculus in explicitly cued task switching.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):978-94. PubMed ID: 17683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Logan GD; Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1250-9. PubMed ID: 17225506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Separating the effect of verbal cue on task-set activation into stimulus- and response-related processes: An eye-tracking study.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Mar; 77(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36395034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unconscious activation of task sets.
    Reuss H; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Hommel B
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 21396830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Periáñez JA; Barceló F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1160-72. PubMed ID: 19350711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access?
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):243-94. PubMed ID: 15020213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Goal-driven modulation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays.
    Richard CM; Wright RD; Ward LM
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):939-55. PubMed ID: 14528901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Forstmann BU; Brass M; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 16397813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined perceptual or motor-related expectancies modulated by type of cue.
    Mattler U
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):649-66. PubMed ID: 12812285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.
    Miyake A; Emerson MJ; Padilla F; Ahn JC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):123-42. PubMed ID: 14962397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.