These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15733201)

  • 1. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aging, task complexity, and efficiency modes: the influence of working memory involvement on age differences in response times for verbal and visuospatial tasks.
    Verhaeghen P; Cerella J; Basak C
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Jun; 13(2):254-80. PubMed ID: 16807201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allocation of attention and task difficulty.
    Merrill EC; Peacock M
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 Mar; 98(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 8192904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: a common salience route for detection and compound tasks.
    Zehetleitner M; Proulx MJ; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1760-70. PubMed ID: 19933560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching.
    Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
    Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age, response complexity, and target consistency in visual search.
    Plude DJ; Hoyer WJ; Lazar J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 7128660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual function and cognitive aging: differential role of contrast sensitivity in verbal versus spatial tasks.
    Glass JM
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 17563179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verbal mediation and memory for novel figural designs: a dual interference study.
    Silverberg N; Buchanan L
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):198-209. PubMed ID: 15708217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
    Lange EB; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactive effects of physical work and carbon monoxide on cognitive task performance.
    Bunnell DE; Horvath SM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Dec; 59(12):1133-8. PubMed ID: 3240213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.