BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15733202)

  • 1. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M
    Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 132(6):920-45. PubMed ID: 17073527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imagining projective transformations: aligned orientations in spatial organization.
    Pani JR; Jeffres JA; Shippey GT; Schwartz KJ
    Cogn Psychol; 1996 Oct; 31(2):125-67. PubMed ID: 8936487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mental rotation depends on the number of objects rather than on the number of image fragments.
    Koning A; van Lier R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Sep; 117(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 15288229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects.
    Flombaum JI; Scholl BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):840-53. PubMed ID: 16846283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between object files and conscious perception.
    Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ; Wynn K
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):67-92. PubMed ID: 15833307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What was where? Memory for object locations.
    Postma A; De Haan EH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 8920102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects.
    Balas BJ; Sinha P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging preserves the ability to perceive 3D object shape from static but not deforming boundary contours.
    Norman JF; Bartholomew AN; Burton CL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 18632085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
    Harris IM; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.
    Haladjian HH; Pylyshyn ZW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 21264734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition.
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):910-23. PubMed ID: 19429968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect.
    Goldfarb L; Treisman A
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 20483846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search for object orientation can be modulated by canonical orientation.
    Ballaz C; Boutsen L; Peyrin C; Humphreys GW; Marendaz C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):20-39. PubMed ID: 15709861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Going, going, gone: localizing abrupt offsets of moving objects.
    Maus GW; Nijhawan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 19485681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1350-65. PubMed ID: 18927018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.